Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ddddd, post: 3959548, member: 22377&quot;]The “unique” reference was for the grade, “AU 58+” (I can see how it can be a bit confusing with the way I wrote that sentence). </p><p><br /></p><p>What’s interesting about the AU 58+ is that was an earlier generation of holder-closer to when the plus was adopted at PCGS. It’s also the only 58+ for the date and possibly the only one for the series (I haven’t confirmed that part).</p><p><br /></p><p>I think both are fairly graded and the NGC might even be low. With a 62 I’d expect more issues, but this one doesn’t have any. Interestingly enough, the seller told me it was in a PCGS 63 OGH holder and he cracked it to try for an upgrade. </p><p><br /></p><p>The NGC photo might also be swaying some opinions as I recall people thinking it looked like corrosion or damage when I used it for a guess the grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in