Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;brg5658, post: 2355877, member: 29751&quot;]As already pointed out by [USER=46237]@Jaelus[/USER] , NGC does stand by it.&nbsp; PCGS also doesn&#039;t stand by many of their mistakes, writing them off as &quot;mechanical errors&quot; -- if you think otherwise you are deluding yourself.&nbsp; I have seen Type 1 1917 SLQs in Type 2 holders.&nbsp; I have seen proofs called MS, wrong dates, wrong series, even wrong denominations on PCGS holder labels.&nbsp; Anything they deem &quot;obvious enough that anyone should have caught it&quot; they write off as mechanical errors -- and they do NOT guarantee those. </p><p><br /></p><p>As I already said, your comment is NOT RELEVANT TO <u><b>THIS THREAD</b></u>.&nbsp; We aren&#039;t talking about buying a coin already slabbed by a buyer who didn&#039;t know what he/she was doing.&nbsp; We&#039;re talking about a VERY RARE and unlikely possibility that NGC might put something wrong on a label when submitting a RAW token.&nbsp; I know you have a financial interest in propping up PCGS as the infallible wonder-TPG, but as for exonumia, I would not send ANYTHING to PCGS for grading or attribution.&nbsp; And, I actually collect a substantial amount of exonumia.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in