Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Which TPG do you use, and why do you use it?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="rld14, post: 1111078, member: 16133"]To further clarify... I wholeheartedly agree that a large percentage of this is pure unadulterated bull... poop.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have seen truly nice coins even in ACG slabs (85-CC Morgan MS64 that was a, IMO, lock 65... and someone who I trust implicitly and who used to work as a grader agreed).</p><p><br /></p><p>I think that a few separate factors have hurt NGC in the eyes of some collectors.</p><p><br /></p><p>First is the set registry. A PCGS coin can reside in EITHER registry, yet an NGC coin cannot.</p><p><br /></p><p>Second is the PCGS Secure program and the Coin Sniffer plus the doctoring lawsuit. This has brought PCGS a lot of press, and whether or not you like it, one has to agree that a lot of collectors feel that they now have less chance of buying a doctored coin in a PCGS holder. I remember last year when I was at FUN I saw these coin scanners, and thought "Ya know, PCGS or NGC oughta use these". Then I saw the announcement!</p><p><br /></p><p>Third is the color issue, agree with it or don't (Lehigh I'd love your thoughts on this) but there's a lot of chatter and thought that I hear on the bourse floor, at club meetings, that if a coin has exceptional toning and is in a PCGS slab then you KNOW it's the real deal. Of course I KNOW of ATd coins that PCGS has holdered and I KNOW of NT coins that they refused to holder but again, it's perception.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fourth is NCS, a lot of people feel that this is a doctoring issue and that NGC does doctor coins because of NCS. The 93-S Morgan that they destroyed comes to mind.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fifth is the fact that they are part owned by Heritage, there was a thread on the CU boards about this not long ago. I don't know how well this sits with me either. OTOH, CU is publicly traded and Heritage could just as easily buy CU stock.</p><p><br /></p><p>But I still think that a lot of it is indeed perception, but perception is all it takes. Just like my cars... I have a Jaguar and a Lexus, the Lexus is an unreliable nightmare with atrocious service from 2 dealers and Lexus themselves. I would NEVER have another Lexus if you gave it to me. Meanwhile, the Jaguar has been nearly faultless, one of the best cars I have ever owned.</p><p><br /></p><p>But Lexus has a reputation of outstanding reliability and Jaguars have a reputation for falling apart.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="rld14, post: 1111078, member: 16133"]To further clarify... I wholeheartedly agree that a large percentage of this is pure unadulterated bull... poop. I have seen truly nice coins even in ACG slabs (85-CC Morgan MS64 that was a, IMO, lock 65... and someone who I trust implicitly and who used to work as a grader agreed). I think that a few separate factors have hurt NGC in the eyes of some collectors. First is the set registry. A PCGS coin can reside in EITHER registry, yet an NGC coin cannot. Second is the PCGS Secure program and the Coin Sniffer plus the doctoring lawsuit. This has brought PCGS a lot of press, and whether or not you like it, one has to agree that a lot of collectors feel that they now have less chance of buying a doctored coin in a PCGS holder. I remember last year when I was at FUN I saw these coin scanners, and thought "Ya know, PCGS or NGC oughta use these". Then I saw the announcement! Third is the color issue, agree with it or don't (Lehigh I'd love your thoughts on this) but there's a lot of chatter and thought that I hear on the bourse floor, at club meetings, that if a coin has exceptional toning and is in a PCGS slab then you KNOW it's the real deal. Of course I KNOW of ATd coins that PCGS has holdered and I KNOW of NT coins that they refused to holder but again, it's perception. Fourth is NCS, a lot of people feel that this is a doctoring issue and that NGC does doctor coins because of NCS. The 93-S Morgan that they destroyed comes to mind. Fifth is the fact that they are part owned by Heritage, there was a thread on the CU boards about this not long ago. I don't know how well this sits with me either. OTOH, CU is publicly traded and Heritage could just as easily buy CU stock. But I still think that a lot of it is indeed perception, but perception is all it takes. Just like my cars... I have a Jaguar and a Lexus, the Lexus is an unreliable nightmare with atrocious service from 2 dealers and Lexus themselves. I would NEVER have another Lexus if you gave it to me. Meanwhile, the Jaguar has been nearly faultless, one of the best cars I have ever owned. But Lexus has a reputation of outstanding reliability and Jaguars have a reputation for falling apart.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Which TPG do you use, and why do you use it?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...