Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which of these two crusty Kennedy Halves do you prefer?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1603219, member: 15309"]You are right Chris. It is extremely rare that I criticize another collector for paying a premium for a toned coin. But we are not talking about a bag toned Morgan Dollar here. We are talking about very common silver coins with extremely unusual toning that is carrying a huge premium. While the toning correspondence on both coins is correct, exactly what caused these two Kennedy's to tone the way that they did? This is not the result of album toning. An album toned coin would not have a peripheral area devoid of toning. Furthermore, album toned coins follow the normal progression of repeating bands of yellow-magenta-cyan. Neither of these two coins display what I would call typical color schemes or progressions for a Kennedy Half Dollar. Take a look at the reverse of the second coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://imagecache.teletrade.com/photos/coins/34/07/c34072478-1b_w2560.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>So what exactly caused the spotting inside the terminal toning state area? On the rare occasion that I have seen spotting like this on a toned coin, the toning has been artificial. It is my opinion that these coins were created by a gloved hand holding the coin while a foreign substance was applied to the coin to create the toning. I don't have proof of this mind you, but it is my opinion that neither of these two coins are market acceptable and I don't think they belong in PCGS plastic. In my mind, this is what a market acceptable toned Kennedy should look like.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Kennedy%20Half%20Dollars/KHD1964GEMBU1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>When I see people paying huge premiums for coins that have a multitude of problems like these two coins, they deserve to be called bidiots. I mean really, with a mark on the focal area of the shield and subdued luster due to terminal state toning to have a grade of MS66 is problem number one. Add to it the questionable nature of the very unusual toning and they risk entering the bidiot hall of fame.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1603219, member: 15309"]You are right Chris. It is extremely rare that I criticize another collector for paying a premium for a toned coin. But we are not talking about a bag toned Morgan Dollar here. We are talking about very common silver coins with extremely unusual toning that is carrying a huge premium. While the toning correspondence on both coins is correct, exactly what caused these two Kennedy's to tone the way that they did? This is not the result of album toning. An album toned coin would not have a peripheral area devoid of toning. Furthermore, album toned coins follow the normal progression of repeating bands of yellow-magenta-cyan. Neither of these two coins display what I would call typical color schemes or progressions for a Kennedy Half Dollar. Take a look at the reverse of the second coin. [img]http://imagecache.teletrade.com/photos/coins/34/07/c34072478-1b_w2560.jpg[/img] So what exactly caused the spotting inside the terminal toning state area? On the rare occasion that I have seen spotting like this on a toned coin, the toning has been artificial. It is my opinion that these coins were created by a gloved hand holding the coin while a foreign substance was applied to the coin to create the toning. I don't have proof of this mind you, but it is my opinion that neither of these two coins are market acceptable and I don't think they belong in PCGS plastic. In my mind, this is what a market acceptable toned Kennedy should look like. [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Kennedy%20Half%20Dollars/KHD1964GEMBU1.jpg[/IMG] When I see people paying huge premiums for coins that have a multitude of problems like these two coins, they deserve to be called bidiots. I mean really, with a mark on the focal area of the shield and subdued luster due to terminal state toning to have a grade of MS66 is problem number one. Add to it the questionable nature of the very unusual toning and they risk entering the bidiot hall of fame.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which of these two crusty Kennedy Halves do you prefer?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...