Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which is More Important?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3323199, member: 85693"]Those are some spectacular, and historically significant countermarks, Jamesicus - thanks for sharing those, and for the additional information on them.</p><p><br /></p><p>While we're on the topic of appearance, etc., I've been collecting ancient countermarks for about a year, and my standards, such as they are, really drop when it comes to countermarks - if there is hope of identifying the countermark on an otherwise worn smooth host coin, I will go for it (if the price is right). Below are a few examples of coins that appeal to me despite some rather spectacular flaws.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are a couple of common AVG and TICA countermarks believed to be around the time of Claudius:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]880794[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a terrible Ptolemaic Egypt countermarked with a Seleucid anchor:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]880795[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, two more Roman countermarks and a lyre countermarked on Aigai Aeolis AE (which isn't actually too bad):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]880796[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>One of the things I really like about collecting ancient countermarks is that collector interest seems pretty low, at least on eBay. I typically only pay a couple bucks for the more common or uglier ones.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3323199, member: 85693"]Those are some spectacular, and historically significant countermarks, Jamesicus - thanks for sharing those, and for the additional information on them. While we're on the topic of appearance, etc., I've been collecting ancient countermarks for about a year, and my standards, such as they are, really drop when it comes to countermarks - if there is hope of identifying the countermark on an otherwise worn smooth host coin, I will go for it (if the price is right). Below are a few examples of coins that appeal to me despite some rather spectacular flaws. Here are a couple of common AVG and TICA countermarks believed to be around the time of Claudius: [ATTACH=full]880794[/ATTACH] Here is a terrible Ptolemaic Egypt countermarked with a Seleucid anchor: [ATTACH=full]880795[/ATTACH] Finally, two more Roman countermarks and a lyre countermarked on Aigai Aeolis AE (which isn't actually too bad): [ATTACH=full]880796[/ATTACH] One of the things I really like about collecting ancient countermarks is that collector interest seems pretty low, at least on eBay. I typically only pay a couple bucks for the more common or uglier ones.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which is More Important?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...