Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which is More Important?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3322295, member: 19463"]As threads tend to do, this left the original question and wandered away. No one said that history and price are not important considerations. The question was whether, all else being equal, style or condition made more difference to us. More said the like style. Sale results suggest the opposite. That may be because the average CT participant is not the average collector but, as a group, is aware of more considerations than VF versus MS. Relatively few here are primarily interested in the cash value and investment potential of coins. More of us realize that we won't be repaid at a living wage for all the time we spend learning, for all the books we buy or for the mistakes we make along the way. We attract many people who have become just a bit bored with their previous coin hobby and are looking for a bit more complexity. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I respect AJ greatly and love to look at his wonderful coins but my take on the hobby is almost exactly the opposite from his order. I value most coins as having history and tend not to go for the ones covered better by surviving writers than those whose history requires digging. That eliminates his #1 from my hobby. I see #2 beauty and #6 eye appeal as closely related and probably put more emphasis in his words "for the type" than many people. We definitely reverse #3 and #5 since I prefer detail lost to wear to detail never on the flan due to centering. #4 marks and scrapes also bother me less than details lost to centering as long as the seller is more offended by the faults than I am and prices accordingly. I love test cuts and dislike scrapes from overly zealous metal detectorist shovels. The one thing AJ did not cover is my #1 of #1 attractions. I love coins that teach me something and demonstrate some technical factor of coin production or mint operation. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I like coins that have a lot to say even if they have faces only a mother could love. The wonderful part of the hobby is there are plenty of coins for each of us. I do not want AJ's competition for the coins I want. For that matter, I wish all of you would go over to collecting only boring baubles with MS labels so I could have more of those junky F-VF coins I love.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3322295, member: 19463"]As threads tend to do, this left the original question and wandered away. No one said that history and price are not important considerations. The question was whether, all else being equal, style or condition made more difference to us. More said the like style. Sale results suggest the opposite. That may be because the average CT participant is not the average collector but, as a group, is aware of more considerations than VF versus MS. Relatively few here are primarily interested in the cash value and investment potential of coins. More of us realize that we won't be repaid at a living wage for all the time we spend learning, for all the books we buy or for the mistakes we make along the way. We attract many people who have become just a bit bored with their previous coin hobby and are looking for a bit more complexity. I respect AJ greatly and love to look at his wonderful coins but my take on the hobby is almost exactly the opposite from his order. I value most coins as having history and tend not to go for the ones covered better by surviving writers than those whose history requires digging. That eliminates his #1 from my hobby. I see #2 beauty and #6 eye appeal as closely related and probably put more emphasis in his words "for the type" than many people. We definitely reverse #3 and #5 since I prefer detail lost to wear to detail never on the flan due to centering. #4 marks and scrapes also bother me less than details lost to centering as long as the seller is more offended by the faults than I am and prices accordingly. I love test cuts and dislike scrapes from overly zealous metal detectorist shovels. The one thing AJ did not cover is my #1 of #1 attractions. I love coins that teach me something and demonstrate some technical factor of coin production or mint operation. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I like coins that have a lot to say even if they have faces only a mother could love. The wonderful part of the hobby is there are plenty of coins for each of us. I do not want AJ's competition for the coins I want. For that matter, I wish all of you would go over to collecting only boring baubles with MS labels so I could have more of those junky F-VF coins I love.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which is More Important?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...