Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which company is the toughest grader NCG or PCGS?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2435718, member: 24314"]'<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />@SuperDave has posted this: Well, I can proceed in <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">blissful ignorance</span> because I have the apparent offender on Ignore and <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">didn't see any of what</span> has incensed everyone so much. Therefore, I can think of the bigger picture - a lot of people <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">who deserve better than to read only a bunch of sniping </span>and maybe deserve some <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">actual content</span>. <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">[As requested in a very appropriate manner the first time] </span>This thread has 68 posts and 817 reads; as usual, only a small percentage of those reading are actually participating.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lehigh96's images, albeit sharp and clear, are too small to identify specifically areas of moved metal which are characteristic of whizzing. <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">This is absolutely correct; however, anyone who learns what the "typical altered luster" of a whizzed coin can see at a quick glance that it is whizzed.</span>Another important - although not universal - whizzing characteristic <b>is</b> present to the informed observer even in small images like these.</p><p><br /></p><p>We can all see the "too shiny" areas in the fields (especially for the level of wear) and the lack of finish contrast between the bust and adjacent fields which are hallmarks of a cleaned coin. That's plain. In this case, though, it's important to notice how little of that applied, smooth finish reaches the tighter areas, and just how "large" those "tighter areas" are. Whizzing, by definition, employs a larger tool than other cleaning methods <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">(??)</span>, and a major characteristic of a whizzed coin (at least, one done with a half-hearted <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">(?) </span>attempt at informed, deliberate deception like this example) is that the damage/effect will usually be limited to the widest-open areas of the coin. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Not entirely true.</span></p><p><br /></p><p>None of the "shiny" on Lehigh96's coin reaches the rim, mostly <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">due to the lighting. </span>or areas like underneath the hair ribbon <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">It's there </span>, around the date <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">It's there EXCEPT for UNDER the numerals.</span> ,or above the head <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">The shiny whizzing is there also. </span>on the obverse. On the reverse, look amongst the stars and under the MM and arrows. See the marks? Those are what the whizzing was intended to eliminate,<span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"> This makes a really good sounding "story." The main reason coins are whizzed is to make them look like a "frosty" original BU coin. Whizzing is RARELY done to remove marks or hide repairs.</span> but the polishing wheel couldn't reach them without severely damaging the adjacent device details <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Whizzing has damaged ALL the relief details on this coin - that's what whizzing does! </span>so the miscreant stayed away from them.</p><p><br /></p><p>And <b><i>that's</i> the lesser-known hallmark of whizzing</b> - no marks on the open fields <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Absolutely incorrect! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span>- where you'd most expect them - yet marks remaining in the places the whizzing tool couldn't reach. It's also the difference between whizzing and mechanical cleaning like brushing and polishing. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Totally misinformed statement. </span>You whiz a coin to remove <i>marks</i>, not to remove <i>crud</i>. <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">While I GUESS <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">SOME FOOL </span>might TRY to remove marks by whizzing a coin - that is not the reason the majority of coins are whizzed (see above). </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Now, I'll ask all the doubter's here to do a little experiment so I can back up MY POST. Please click on the obverse of the Barber Half. <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Do you see ALL THE MARKS LEFT ON THE SURFACE OF THE COIN that the whizzing did not remove? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">When a coin is whizzed, the only places where ANY untouched surface remains is RIGHT UP NEXT to he point where the relief meets the field. That is where the tool leaves the coin's surface. As it does this, the edge of the relief design appears pushed up into a very thin lip<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">*</span>. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">*</span>This is the <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">ONLY</span> <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">characteristic that defines whizzing</span> from any other form of mechanical cleaning. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Perhaps, a member can alert those who choose to stay uninformed about this post. I tried to PM one of them so we could discuss this post and perhaps make some corrections for himself to save me the time. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2435718, member: 24314"]':angelic:@SuperDave has posted this: Well, I can proceed in [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]blissful ignorance[/COLOR] because I have the apparent offender on Ignore and [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]didn't see any of what[/COLOR] has incensed everyone so much. Therefore, I can think of the bigger picture - a lot of people [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]who deserve better than to read only a bunch of sniping [/COLOR]and maybe deserve some [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]actual content[/COLOR]. [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)][As requested in a very appropriate manner the first time] [/COLOR]This thread has 68 posts and 817 reads; as usual, only a small percentage of those reading are actually participating. Lehigh96's images, albeit sharp and clear, are too small to identify specifically areas of moved metal which are characteristic of whizzing. [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]This is absolutely correct; however, anyone who learns what the "typical altered luster" of a whizzed coin can see at a quick glance that it is whizzed.[/COLOR]Another important - although not universal - whizzing characteristic [B]is[/B] present to the informed observer even in small images like these. We can all see the "too shiny" areas in the fields (especially for the level of wear) and the lack of finish contrast between the bust and adjacent fields which are hallmarks of a cleaned coin. That's plain. In this case, though, it's important to notice how little of that applied, smooth finish reaches the tighter areas, and just how "large" those "tighter areas" are. Whizzing, by definition, employs a larger tool than other cleaning methods [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)](??)[/COLOR], and a major characteristic of a whizzed coin (at least, one done with a half-hearted [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)](?) [/COLOR]attempt at informed, deliberate deception like this example) is that the damage/effect will usually be limited to the widest-open areas of the coin. :facepalm: [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]Not entirely true.[/COLOR] None of the "shiny" on Lehigh96's coin reaches the rim, mostly [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]due to the lighting. [/COLOR]or areas like underneath the hair ribbon [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]It's there [/COLOR], around the date [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]It's there EXCEPT for UNDER the numerals.[/COLOR] ,or above the head [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]The shiny whizzing is there also. [/COLOR]on the obverse. On the reverse, look amongst the stars and under the MM and arrows. See the marks? Those are what the whizzing was intended to eliminate,[COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] This makes a really good sounding "story." The main reason coins are whizzed is to make them look like a "frosty" original BU coin. Whizzing is RARELY done to remove marks or hide repairs.[/COLOR] but the polishing wheel couldn't reach them without severely damaging the adjacent device details [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]Whizzing has damaged ALL the relief details on this coin - that's what whizzing does! [/COLOR]so the miscreant stayed away from them. And [B][I]that's[/I] the lesser-known hallmark of whizzing[/B] - no marks on the open fields [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]Absolutely incorrect! :angelic: [/COLOR]- where you'd most expect them - yet marks remaining in the places the whizzing tool couldn't reach. It's also the difference between whizzing and mechanical cleaning like brushing and polishing. :facepalm: [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]Totally misinformed statement. [/COLOR]You whiz a coin to remove [I]marks[/I], not to remove [I]crud[/I]. [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]While I GUESS [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]SOME FOOL [/COLOR]might TRY to remove marks by whizzing a coin - that is not the reason the majority of coins are whizzed (see above). [/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] Now, I'll ask all the doubter's here to do a little experiment so I can back up MY POST. Please click on the obverse of the Barber Half. [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Do you see ALL THE MARKS LEFT ON THE SURFACE OF THE COIN that the whizzing did not remove? :jawdrop:[/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] When a coin is whizzed, the only places where ANY untouched surface remains is RIGHT UP NEXT to he point where the relief meets the field. That is where the tool leaves the coin's surface. As it does this, the edge of the relief design appears pushed up into a very thin lip[COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)]*[/COLOR]. [/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]*[/COLOR]This is the [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]ONLY[/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]characteristic that defines whizzing[/COLOR] from any other form of mechanical cleaning. :cigar: [/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] Perhaps, a member can alert those who choose to stay uninformed about this post. I tried to PM one of them so we could discuss this post and perhaps make some corrections for himself to save me the time. :angelic:[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which company is the toughest grader NCG or PCGS?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...