I actually do state in my auction you cannot use my text or pictures. Ebay actually has a reporting option if someone is using your pictures.
jwitten my question was , why does it bug you? Didn't you sell the coin and isn't the listing and all that is in it part of that sale? What do you charge someone to image a coin? Why not just include a imaging fee of $20.00 to each listing and allow others to use your obviously superior images? This way you would not have to feel agitated that someone appreciated your imaging work enough to use because it is far superior to anything they can produce? Sorry for jacking the thread for this issue and I would like to know which set of images are yours.
No... You sell the coin, not the pictures, the description, the marketing, etc. If you have a logo in your auction, can people steal your logo? I did not realize this was so controversial. It is pretty common to not be able to use other people photos without permission.
It's all good that's why I said you could charge a fee. Once my images are posted to the internet I consider them usable by others unless I actually copyright them and list a disclaimer with them. I for one am happy to let others use my images as a reference when referring to a coin I post or one I have for sale. Just like being on different forums and having an image used on those forums or posted from one to the other is not a problem for me. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this issue jwitten. I would recommend we do not take up any more of this posts space on a topic that does not pertain to the OP.
This is kinda off topic, but I'll wade in one more time: Dude, YOU don't own the coin anymore once you sell it. Why do you care if the OWNER of the coin uses the photos, or burns them, or shreds them, or prints them off to hang on the wall, or resell them at a later date? I can see why you would not want random internet people stealing your pics to use in their own logos / marketing, as that has happened to members here before, and I agree that is not cool. But what you are talking about is that it annoys you that the person who possesses the coin, and paid you money for the coin, is using images you took. Again, why would it bother you that your customers are getting some value-added from your nice images? Maybe stop using such great photos and the coin owner wont want to steal them from you. You ever think you would sell more coins if you didn't have such a strange policy about the photo use? Bad analogy follows: It's like one of those horror stories I hear when someone with a nice camera and some basic photography skills tries to get photo prints of their own kids at Walmart, and the employee says, "these are too good, you must have stolen these family photos from a professional portrait photographer, you can't print those here." It's just asinine... They are my kids!
Okay, I guess it's time for the reveal: Seller took set A. (I think they are pretty good) I took set B. Most of you like set B, but a few like the seller photos better.
Your lighting lighting is much better than the sellers images. The only issue I have with your images is that the surface of the coins looks dull/lifeless. Would share with us your set up, camera, lights, etc..
That is one downside of my current method, it values detail over luster. See here for most of my info and setup: Coin Photography: Lens Commentary using Nikon D7000
Ok so I just went and had a look at your set up and some of the sample images, they are all soft. What lens are you using on your nikon now? I can tell you that the shorter focal length lenses give you less opportunity to adjust your lighting. My recommendation would be to use a 100mm or better dedicated macro lens, get your lighting up high and at 10 and 2 and if possible get those lights above the end of the lens or put a hood on it. Does your camera allow for live view operation of the camera from the computer for all functions or just to snap the pic? I am current using a Canon and switched from Nikon a number of years ago because of the live view, native software and the macro lens quality.
I don't care for live view, but I have tried. I cant get a good image in software, there are some posts in that thread that detail it. I think its a limitation of my older camera / bandwidth. I did determine that that 105mm nikkor mico lens is much better than my current 50mm sigma, which is very old. When I have the money I will certainly be picking it up. I have heard Canon is much better for macro work due to less shutter slap, and I read a technical paper on it but I cant seem to find it. Even if that is true, I am a Nikon person through and through. I am heavily invested in the Nikon ecosystem, and will be probably for life. Thanks for your feedback. I am using a few new tricks now, but since I don't have that nice 105mm lens, I am just back to my normal 50mm prime and D7000, which does a decent job, but not fantastic.
One trick you may try is getting a macro extension tube set for one of your longer focal lenses. This will change how the light through the lens hits your sensor and would give you more working distance. If you like I could talk to some of my contacts to see if they have a lens at a good price for your camera. Also the bandwidth should not be an issue, it could be as simple as a better patch cable. The software along with the Canon camera was much easier to use than my Nikon setup. I now use a T3i body and a 100mm full frame USM Canon Macro (so 150 on the APS-c). The lens is nice because it does not move at all no rotation and al focusing is internal. here is one of my Pics.
just an idea as this seems to be a good deal on the bay. 150mm for 590.00 http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sigma-150mm...44621895?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item4623942447