Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which Auction site would you rank #1 for Ancients?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2931488, member: 19463"]I consider it a fact that being a seller of ancient coins is relatively easy compared to being a buyer of ancient coins at a price that will allow you to sell them. Neither seller nor buyer is happy assuming the role of bearing the difference between what the buyer pays and what the seller gets. Buyers feel ripped off when they end up paying $700 on a $500 bid. Sellers feel ripped off when they see their coin hammered at $700 but the check they get is for $500. Happy sellers are more likely to return to sell with more coins to sell. Unhappy buyers may go away but will be replaced by new buyers who don't understand that you should not bid $500 on a coin that is worth $500 to you. The current system does make it easier for a seller to understand why they got the pay-out they got and there is no auction without material to sell. To me, that makes the current system the best answer. If everyone understood and allowed for the system correctly, there would be more coins that did not sell and more unhappy sellers. As a buyer, we can get mad and go away with less impact than if a seller of a million dollar collection decides not to consign. </p><p><br /></p><p>I do not understand business. On thing I really do not understand is how auction houses can publish those print catalogs which are better references than many $100 books. Surely it is not to encourage me to buy more than I would have from the online catalog. I do have a guess. Perhaps it will cause another owner of a million dollar collection who is not part of the online generation to come forward and consign his coins. Wouldn't it be nice to get to see the catalog of your collection published before your death and know your babies found good homes? It won't help me and other low end gatherers whose holdings are not publication worthy. </p><p><br /></p><p>The success of large coin auctions depends less on sold coins that go out in today's mail than it does on what comes in to guarantee there will be a sale next year. Coddling potential sellers does seem like a good idea after all.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2931488, member: 19463"]I consider it a fact that being a seller of ancient coins is relatively easy compared to being a buyer of ancient coins at a price that will allow you to sell them. Neither seller nor buyer is happy assuming the role of bearing the difference between what the buyer pays and what the seller gets. Buyers feel ripped off when they end up paying $700 on a $500 bid. Sellers feel ripped off when they see their coin hammered at $700 but the check they get is for $500. Happy sellers are more likely to return to sell with more coins to sell. Unhappy buyers may go away but will be replaced by new buyers who don't understand that you should not bid $500 on a coin that is worth $500 to you. The current system does make it easier for a seller to understand why they got the pay-out they got and there is no auction without material to sell. To me, that makes the current system the best answer. If everyone understood and allowed for the system correctly, there would be more coins that did not sell and more unhappy sellers. As a buyer, we can get mad and go away with less impact than if a seller of a million dollar collection decides not to consign. I do not understand business. On thing I really do not understand is how auction houses can publish those print catalogs which are better references than many $100 books. Surely it is not to encourage me to buy more than I would have from the online catalog. I do have a guess. Perhaps it will cause another owner of a million dollar collection who is not part of the online generation to come forward and consign his coins. Wouldn't it be nice to get to see the catalog of your collection published before your death and know your babies found good homes? It won't help me and other low end gatherers whose holdings are not publication worthy. The success of large coin auctions depends less on sold coins that go out in today's mail than it does on what comes in to guarantee there will be a sale next year. Coddling potential sellers does seem like a good idea after all.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Which Auction site would you rank #1 for Ancients?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...