Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RonSanderson, post: 8102241, member: 77413&quot;]Morgandude11 really covers my analysis about what I see.</p><p><br /></p><p>All three have the same excellent obverses with just the slightest strike weakness on the cheekbone.</p><p><br /></p><p>I acknowledge the delightful toning on the first one, which is something I really like. The orange peel die wear and rough surface under Monticello looks like it kicks up the luster, too.</p><p><br /></p><p>From there I think it is just a matter of taste. I like a detailed strike. Coins 2 and 3 have sharp reverses, with number 2 gaining an edge on the detailed steps - which are, for once, in addition to the overall sharpness. So often the full steps are accompanied by a weak Monticello, but not here.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, the strikes are so sharp that the surfaces seem to have more of a proof-like smoothness that may reduce the luster. So I can see folks preferring the first coin over either of the other two.</p><p><br /></p><p>My choice would be number 2, given my personal tastes.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in