Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 7928156, member: 15309&quot;]Alright, it is time for the reveal, and nobody got both coins correct.</p><p><br /></p><p>Coin #1</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/t9SRFkA.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Coin #2</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/SEgIk3r.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The reason for this little exercise is because Coin #1 was part of most recent submission while Coin #2 was from a submission last year and resided in my registry set.&nbsp; I was expecting an MS66 5FS grade from NGC and was going to bump the PCGS coin from registry.&nbsp; To my eye, the reverse of Coin #1 is an MS67 with clear 5FS all day long.&nbsp; The toning affords a level of eye appeal that Coin #2 simply doesn&#039;t have, and I think Coin #1 is clearly the superior coin.&nbsp; But NGC threw a monkey wrench into my plans when they were punitive in their grading, by allowing the admittedly MS65 obverse to control the overall grade of the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>But like most of the respondents of this thread, I simply like Coin #1 better and I don&#039;t care that it is graded lower, it is going to represent the Atlantic City Set of Jefferson Nickels.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in