Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which 1959 Jefferson Nickel do you prefer?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 4998553, member: 15309"]Lol, that's cheating.</p><p><br /></p><p>So anyone who has ever seen my registry collection knows two things. I love eye appeal first and foremost, and second, I am not a slave to the full step designation or the additional registry points it often affords.</p><p><br /></p><p>As most of you have surmised, the semi prooflike full stepper was my existing registry coin and was worth a whopping 1558 registry points. The problem is that almost every other coin in my collection has brilliant luster and it always made this coin seem out of place. Additionally, the nature of the prooflike surfaces accentuates every little mark on the coin making it appear overgraded at first glance.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/VL808pX.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>There is really nothing wrong with the coin other than it just doesn't fit well into my collection. I purchased the new 1959 with the intention of flipping it on eBay since it is only worth 442 registry points, but once I saw this absolutely blazing coin in hand, I knew the MS66 5FS was going up on the block.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Lf7RnoE.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Strike designations are somewhat of a curse IMO. Not only because they make collectors slaves to a very small area of the coin, but because they do it at the expense of the rest of the coin. The TPGs would have you believe that Full Steps on a Jefferson Nickel is the leading indicator of the quality of strike and nothing could be further from the truth. Take these two coins for example. The full step designation programs us to instantly look at the reverse, compare the step detail, and then compare the details of Monticello. And that would be fine if there wasn't another side to the coin. If I asked most people, they would say that the prooflike coin is the better struck coin. But If we look closely, the obverse of the MS67 is clearly better struck than the MS66 5FS. And I would say that the degree to which the MS67 has a better stuck obverse than the MS66 5FS exceeds the degree to which the MS66 5FS has a better struck reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the end, it is coins like these that shine a light on how different collectors have different preferences within the coin grading spectrum. Those who prefer blazing luster and eye appeal will usually choose the MS67, whereas those who covet strike and full details will usually choose the MS66 5FS.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 4998553, member: 15309"]Lol, that's cheating. So anyone who has ever seen my registry collection knows two things. I love eye appeal first and foremost, and second, I am not a slave to the full step designation or the additional registry points it often affords. As most of you have surmised, the semi prooflike full stepper was my existing registry coin and was worth a whopping 1558 registry points. The problem is that almost every other coin in my collection has brilliant luster and it always made this coin seem out of place. Additionally, the nature of the prooflike surfaces accentuates every little mark on the coin making it appear overgraded at first glance. [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/VL808pX.jpg[/IMG] There is really nothing wrong with the coin other than it just doesn't fit well into my collection. I purchased the new 1959 with the intention of flipping it on eBay since it is only worth 442 registry points, but once I saw this absolutely blazing coin in hand, I knew the MS66 5FS was going up on the block. [img]https://i.imgur.com/Lf7RnoE.jpg[/img] Strike designations are somewhat of a curse IMO. Not only because they make collectors slaves to a very small area of the coin, but because they do it at the expense of the rest of the coin. The TPGs would have you believe that Full Steps on a Jefferson Nickel is the leading indicator of the quality of strike and nothing could be further from the truth. Take these two coins for example. The full step designation programs us to instantly look at the reverse, compare the step detail, and then compare the details of Monticello. And that would be fine if there wasn't another side to the coin. If I asked most people, they would say that the prooflike coin is the better struck coin. But If we look closely, the obverse of the MS67 is clearly better struck than the MS66 5FS. And I would say that the degree to which the MS67 has a better stuck obverse than the MS66 5FS exceeds the degree to which the MS66 5FS has a better struck reverse. In the end, it is coins like these that shine a light on how different collectors have different preferences within the coin grading spectrum. Those who prefer blazing luster and eye appeal will usually choose the MS67, whereas those who covet strike and full details will usually choose the MS66 5FS.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Which 1959 Jefferson Nickel do you prefer?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...