Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 5006487, member: 15309&quot;]The problem is that they both have a quality that bothers me.&nbsp; Coin #1 is overgraded, even though I understand why it is graded the way that it is, and Coin #2 just doesn&#039;t sit right with me, never has.</p><p><br /></p><p>At this point, if I am going to keep one, the relevant question seems to be:&nbsp; do I want an overgraded coin, or a coin that only I have a problem with as everyone else sees as perfectly market acceptable toning.&nbsp; The answer to that question would be coin #2.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You are the first person to suggest this, and I have thought about doing exactly this.&nbsp; I have a raw 1956-D that competes with these coins, unfortunately it is quite clearly AT IMO.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/LP8wXnw.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe I sell both coin #1 and coin #2, dip the coin above and hope it grades MS67.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in