Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 5006228, member: 15309&quot;]Ok, so here is the problem.&nbsp; Coin #1 is graded MS67.&nbsp; Now before everyone freaks out, yes the surfaces are not MS67 quality, they are closer to MS65-66, but the luster and strike are so good for a 1956-D, that the coin was market graded to MS67.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Yw40qk2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Those of you who know me well and have seen my posts on this forum over the last 12 years know that I absolutely love rainbow toned coins.&nbsp; Having said that, something about coin #2 has always rubbed me the wrong way.&nbsp; I know that I should just accept that this is typical Dansco toning and be happy with the only MS66* in existence for this date/mm, but the thought that something is hinky about the toning on this coin simply won&#039;t leave my mind.&nbsp; I had the same feeling about my 1963 MS67* and I ended up selling that coin earlier this year.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/BChTBiI.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>My problem is that if I move on from coin #2, will the MS65-66 surfaces of coin #1 linger in my mind in the same manner that the toning of coin #2 has?&nbsp; I still have not voted in my own poll, and so I can&#039;t see the results which I imagine are extremely tight.&nbsp; It would stand to reason that this forum may be just as divided on these two coins as I am in my own mind.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe if we just continue to talk about these two coins, somebody will make a comment that resonates with me so that I can break the tie in my own head.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in