Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 3101654, member: 36230&quot;]The Potter reference came from my initial post, so again perhaps you should refrain from so matter of factly addressing what you clearly do not understand. I also cannot help but to find it quite interesting that you initially felt the need to so authoritatively when disputing observed fact with purely presumptive conjecture, yet now admit you know little about the types of coins in question.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, being direct when addressing an issue doesn&#039;t automatically mean one is stressed, upset, or angry, and I&#039;ll never grasp why this is so difficult for some to understand.</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, perhaps someone should go back and read his own posts if the TPG thing is too hard for him to understand. The ONLY reason it was mentioned was because you brought it up claiming them, in part, &quot;<i>the true culprits</i>&quot;. This too isn&#039;t that difficult to understand, sir.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in