Featured Whence "brass"? About "first brass," "second brass," AE-3, AE-4, etc.

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Roman Collector, Oct 13, 2019.

  1. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Introduction:

    Numismatic terminology can be confusing, especially for those new to ancient coin collecting. Part of the difficulty stems from the fact that the terminology in use arises out of a centuries long tradition of studying and writing about coins. Another part of the difficulty is that we truly don't know the names of certain denominations in use in antiquity, particularly the names of the coins of the Roman imperial period after Constantine I. Therefore, our terminology is a mixture of traditional and modern terms, and often there are two (or more) words for the same denomination. This is not an essay about the various denominations. What follows is a discussion of how certain terms pertaining to copper and copper-alloy coins came into being and how we use them today.

    What's up with the word brass?

    Ancient coins are made out of copper, orichalcum, or bronze. Why such terms as "first brass" or "second brass" when some of these coins aren't even made out of that alloy?

    Brass is an old English colloquial term for any copper-based coin. When it first came into use in the medieval period, the word did not specifically refer to an alloy of copper and zinc. Langland, in Piers Plowman, circa 1362 (iii, 188-189), has "pore Men þou robbest, and beere heor bras on þi Bac to Caleys to sulle." This is translated as "You rob poor men, and bear their brass on your back to sell in Calais."

    In his translation of the New Testament in 1526, Tyndale translates the Greek of Matthew 10:9, Μὴ κτήσησθε χρυσὸν μηδὲ ἄργυρον μηδὲ χαλκὸν εἰς τὰς ζώνας ὑμῶν, as "Posses not golde nor silver nor brasse yn youre gerdels." The Greek χαλκός (chalkos) properly means copper or bronze. The word ὀρείχαλκος (oreichalkos; Latin orichalcum) was used to refer to what we would term brass in the modern sense. But Tyndale used "brasse" because the word denoted any copper coin to Englishmen at the time.

    At a later period, the word became slang or dialect for money in general. For example:

    "Shame that the Muses should be bought and sold,
    For euerie peasants brasse, on each scaffold."
    -- Bishop Hall, Satires, 1597.

    "Brass, cur? Thou damned and luxurious mountain goat, offer’st me brass?"
    -- Shakespeare, King Henry the Fifth (iv. 4), 1599.

    "Who ne'er despises books that bring him brass."
    -- Byron, Hints from Horace (548), 1811.​

    So that's why the term "brass" is sometimes used in numismatics to refer to coins that are made of copper or bronze, in addition to those made of orichalcum.

    First brass, second brass, and all that jazz:

    The terms first, second, third and fourth brass do not refer to specific denominations, but are terms used to denote the size of coins. This terminology dates to the renaissance, when people didn't have standardized units of measurements nor were rulers or calipers in widespread use. The term "inch," for example, varied quite literally from place to place and reporting a coin's diameter objectively was not feasible. Early numismatic terminology reflects this. "First brass" refers to the largest coins, "second brass" to the second largest coins, "third brass" to the third largest coins, and "fourth brass to the fourth largest (the smallest) coins. Early numismatists used the abbreviations Æ I, Æ II, Æ III and Æ IV to refer to these four sizes.

    Copper-alloy coins of the Roman Principate, i.e. pagan Rome (31 BC-AD 296), came in three sizes, large, middle, and small and "first," "second," and "third brass" (Æ I-Æ III) were used to describe these coins. Indeed, the term "middle bronze" is still used to this day to describe coins of the as or dupondius denominations, especially when patina obscures their metallic composition and it's unclear which denomination they may be. An illustration from @dougsmit 's educational website depicts these three sizes. Sestertii are first brass sized, dupondii and asses are second brass sized, and semisses and quandrantes are third brass sized:

    denomimpearly.jpg

    The term "first brass" refers to any coin that is sestertius-sized, more than about 26 mm in diameter. Banduri,[1] writing in 1718, for example, lists the sestertii of Trajan Decius under a section titled "Numismata Latina Æ. I.", meaning "Roman coins, first brass":

    Capture.JPG

    But he also uses the term Æ I to also refer to Roman colonial issues ...

    Capture 1.JPG

    ... and to Roman provincial coins in the Greek language, which he refers to as "Greek coins first brass":

    Capture 2.JPG

    Similarly, Banduri uses Æ II to refer to dupondii and asses ...

    Capture 3.JPG

    ... and also to Roman provincials of similar size:

    Capture 4.JPG

    Lastly, he uses the term Æ III to refer to semisses and quadrantes, Roman colonial and provincial coins of similar size, as well as to the tiniest late Roman bronze coins of only a centimeter in dimension (more about this later):

    Capture 6.JPG

    Wiczay,[2] writing in 1814, uses the same terminology as Banduri, but he uses the term Æ IV to refer to the tiniest of coins. Here is his listing for coins of Marcus Aurelius:

    Capture 8.JPG

    Note Wiczay's use of Roman numerals I and II to describe these coins. No. 1459, for example, is a sestertius (I), with a portrait he describes as "Cap. laur.," an abbreviation for "laureate head." No. 1457 is a dupondius (II), with a portrait he describes as "cap. rad. min.," an abbreviation for "radiate head, smaller."

    Cohen,[3] writing in 1880, does not use the modern terms "sestertius," "dupondius," "as," "quandrans," etc., either. Rather, he simply uses the terms GB, MB, and PB, to refer to grande (large), moyenne (medium), and petit (small) copper alloy coins.

    Capture 5.JPG

    No. 16, a PB (small bronze) has no S C on the reverse and is the CERERI FRVGIF type used for the denarius (no. 15). This listing can only refer to a limes denarius, described as PB because it's the size of a semis or quadrans. No. 18 is a GB (large bronze, i.e. sestertius) with the CERES S C reverse, while no. 19 is the same design, but a MB (middle bronze, i.e. as or dupondius).

    For coins of the Roman principate, including colonial and provincial issues, we no longer use the terms "first brass," "large bronze," or Æ I; "second brass" or Æ II (though we still use "middle bronze" when a coin cannot be determined to be an as or dupondius); or "third brass," "small bronze," or Æ III. Rather, we use the name of the denomination when known, such as "sestertius," "quadrans," or "tetrassarion." For provincial coins whose denomination is not known, we use Æ (an abbreviation for aes) plus the diameter in millimeters, such as Æ 24 or Æ 18.

    More follows ...
    ~~~

    1. Bandurius, Anselmus. Numismata Imperatorum Romanorum a Trajano Decio Ad Palaeologos Augustos. Vol. 1, Montalant, 1718. Available online here: Vol. 1, Vol 2.

    2. Wiczay, Michael A. and Felice Caronni. Musei Hedervarii in Hungaria numos antiquos graecos et latinos descripsit. Vol. 2, Caronni, Vienna 1814. Available online here.

    3. Cohen, Henry. Description historique des monnaies frappées sous l'Empire Romain, Tome IV: de Septime Sévère à Maxime (193 à 238 après J.-C.). Paris, 1880, p. 107.
     
    DonnaML, otlichnik, eparch and 14 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    For bronze coins of the dominate (post AD 296), also known as late Roman bronze coins, the terms Æ I-Æ IV are still in use. Our own @dougsmit , in his web page about denominations, explains how these terms are used to refer to coins of various sizes:

    "The system uses the abbreviation for bronze followed by a number 1 through 4: AE1 = over 25mm (Valentinian I); AE2 = 21-25mm (Honorius); AE3 = 17-21mm (Arcadius); AE4 = under 17mm (Theodosius I). Of course, there are still coin issues that straddle the lines with various specimens being, for example, slightly over or under 17mm. In this case you see a split listing 'AE3/4'."​

    Doug provides this helpful illustration of each coin size:

    denomae14.jpg

    The reason these coins are described in this way is that we truly don't know what the various denominations were called when they were in circulation. Nonetheless, there has been a movement in recent years to assign names to the coins, such as follis, maiorina, centenionalis, and such. David Vagi[4] and David Sear[5] are among the leading proponents of this movement.

    Of course, we would expect numismatists such as Banduri and Wiczay to use such terminology, and this is indeed the case. Banduri, for example, uses the term Æ III to describe the most commonly encountered bronze coins of Crispus:

    Capture 7.JPG

    Wiczay uses Æ III and Æ IV to describe coins of Constantius II:

    Capture 9.JPG

    Note his catalog describes coins of various sizes on this page. Nos. 4194-4198 refer to Æ II-sized coins. No. 4193 is an Æ III. Nos. 4204-4206 are Æ IV-sized. This terminology is still in use today for bronze coins of the late Roman period.

    Post anything you feel is relevant!

    ~~~

    4. Vagi, David L. Coinage and History of the Roman Empire, c. 82 B.C.- A.D. 480. Vol. 1, Coin World, 1999, pp. 94-97.

    5. Sear, David R. Roman Coins and Their Values II: The accession of Nerva to the overthrow of the Severan dynasty AD 96 - AD 235, London, Spink, 2002, p. 24-26.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2019
    Spaniard, randygeki, Jwt708 and 6 others like this.
  4. Justin Lee

    Justin Lee I learn by doing

    Lots of great information, RC, and interesting narrowing down of the denomination terminology we use today over the recent centuries.

    In summer of 2018, growing in my numismatic knowledge, I found it was very helpful for myself in the creation of these 2 infographics by doing research from the many online sources and reconciling the data (working to understand it all myself) and summarizing it to try to contribute to those walking that same "noob" path after me.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2019
  5. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    Great post
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  6. bernard55

    bernard55 Active Member

    this is an incredible post. thank you!
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  7. otlichnik

    otlichnik Well-Known Member

    Interesting stuff.

    One challenge that we face is that there is a difference between an official name - what a coin was called by those making it - and a popular name, which might be so popular it becomes effectively official.

    For the late Roman period we do have some records referring to things like, for example the maiorina. But really this just means something like "the biggy". So was this an official name or a popular name? It appears in a law demonetizing it, so it was at least used by officials, but might not have been the original name.

    It is interesting to compare to the history of the names of our North American coinage where we may have a pocket full of pennies, nickels, dimes and quarters - not original names but now used even by the mints.

    SC
     
    DonnaML and Roman Collector like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page