Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;geekpryde, post: 26674780, member: 36248&quot;]Well you&#039;ve both given me something to think about.&nbsp;&nbsp; I didnt even consider ordering my Type set beyond the standard (well, what I consider the &#039;standard&#039;) denomination order.</p><p><br /></p><p>I just wrote some quick code that took all my Type set coin photos, in the standard order, and made a copy of them renamed into &#039;chronological&#039; order.</p><p><br /></p><p>I went with [USER=104064]@KBBPLL[/USER] method, as that makes more sense to me than doing it by my coins specific date.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>So, Chronological by the date that the coin Type (AKA coin design) was first used.&nbsp; Then, when there are several designs starting in the same year, ordered by smallest denomination to highest.</p><p><br /></p><p>Code did all the hard work, and I will make a new page on my site showing them this way. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I agree it&#039;s a little chaotic, but I will also admit, this Sort order makes me see my own collection in a whole new light.&nbsp;&nbsp; Grouping by denomination second, and not first, is a worthy method after all. </p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you to <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/gxseries.4373/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/gxseries.4373/">gxseries</a> for starting this thread.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in