Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Severus Alexander, post: 3037701, member: 84744&quot;]Thanks so much [USER=74222]@Herberto[/USER]!&nbsp; Given the quality and fabric of the coin, you&#039;re absolutely right that an 8th century attribution doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense for my coin.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s never disappointing to make a mistake.&nbsp; I relish my mistakes as I usually learn a lot from them... as in this case!&nbsp; It seems I&#039;m in good company, as even CNG regularly makes the same mistake, as in <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3317001" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3317001" rel="nofollow">this listing</a>.&nbsp; In fact, virtually all of the hits on acsearch using &quot;leo iii 1516&quot; are in fact Leo V 1630 like mine.&nbsp; I had better make use of labarum.info more often when I&#039;m unsure.&nbsp; Is that site quite reliable?</p><p><br /></p><p>It seems I am missing a lifetime issue of Leo III in my collection!&nbsp; Very good to know.&nbsp; Is now high on the list. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Thank goodness for CoinTalk!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in