Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KBBPLL, post: 8473913, member: 104064&quot;]Much of the info here <a href="https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-announces-contemporary-counterfeit-status-of-1896-o-1900-o" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-announces-contemporary-counterfeit-status-of-1896-o-1900-o" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-announces-contemporary-counterfeit-status-of-1896-o-1900-o</a>.</p><p>Many more identified since then, 34 die pairs across 7 dates and mints now designated &quot;privately made&quot; VAMs. <a href="http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/Listed_Privately_Made_Varieties" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/Listed_Privately_Made_Varieties" rel="nofollow">http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/Listed_Privately_Made_Varieties</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Regarding the 2005 PCGS article, an interesting tidbit in another article says &quot;In reaction to PCGS’s August 2005 announcement, Numismatic Guaranty Corp. officials stated that NGC had been aware of the nature of the Micro O varieties of 1896-O, 1900-O, and 1902-O Morgan dollars “for the better part of five years,” and that it had long refused to authenticate them as genuine.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in