Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Speedy, post: 104706, member: 705&quot;]I guess what you are saying is that you don&#039;t agree with one of the grades?</p><p>and I bet that the ones you don&#039;t agree with is the 1944 ?? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Well something I&#039;ve just learned myself is that 1944 WL&#039;s are wealy struck--therefor I think I can say it looks great...the luster is BU-T-Full!</p><p>Now if I was buying one...I would go for the 1945...the reasons??...the hand is fully struck..that is the first thing that shows wear and is mostly weakly struck--its toned...not a pretty toning I&#039;ll say but I can be pretty sure that no one has messed with it and &quot;cleaned&quot; it....the other coin is WHITE...and might have had some toning at a point in time....but that is not here or there.</p><p><br /></p><p>Speedy[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in