Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2381526, member: 36230&quot;]I never ask or suggested, nor would I ever expect an apology from you for anything. However, considering your emphasis on providing only correct information, particularly with such a coin, it only seems right that you would hold yourself to the same standards. Obviously many look up to you, and with that should come the responsibility not to mislead, intentionally or not, especially when childishly worrying and focusing more about the person who said it than what was said.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the rest, you act like I invested great time, going through YEARS of your posts to search it out when the fact is ALL I did was to google &quot;<i>hobby protection act &#039;counterfeit dies&#039;</i>&quot; and right there she was in all her deep, deep irony. It is almost an absolute certainty that it took you longer to search out my post in this thread than it did me to find yours, regardless of the date originally posted. Now, I didn&#039;t set out to search your posts, and my only reason for searching for this information was simply to refresh my memory, but perhaps I should thank you for making the quest effortless.</p><p><br /></p><p>You don&#039;t have to like it, and I certainly don&#039;t expect you to, but that thread goes straight to the heart of the matter. When we started these little &quot;discussions&quot;, at least from my end, the only real issue I took was with your blatant copying of designs and your refusal to call a dog a dog. The little schmuckish jabs, insinuations, and deflective nonsense have, regretably, taken this all in a whole different direction, but just as you like to search out past posts of mine, should yours not be fair game as well? &quot;<i>All contributors should expect everything posted to be scrutinized</i>&quot;, remember? You knew this would be walking the line before a single copy was made, yet chose to do so; along with the positive, you also chose to open yourself and your work up to reasonable criticism and, unfortunately, unreasonable as well. I&#039;m not talking about those who pop in once in a while to schmuckishly yell &quot;counterfeit&quot; and disappear without even trying to justify their position, but reasonable critical discourse. Again, this was your choice; you don&#039;t, simply because you may wish it, deserve a pass while others deserve scrutiny, especially coming from you. It certainly reads as though you started that thread to question the legality of the other entity&#039;s dies, Mr. Carr, not I, sir. If it is okay for you to question the legality of the dies used to produce a product less exacting than your own (and you do) it only goes to reason that yours deserve the same. I didn&#039;t make you a public (at least in this hobby) figure, Mr. Carr; as with the products you make, and the choices you&#039;ve made, they is of your own doing.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in