Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What's this white "stuff"?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7748571, member: 19463"]This post brings us to the verge of 'forensic numismatics'. I love technical numismatics or all kinds (except, possibly, cleaning) because it allows me to take photos that are not just passport/drivers license grade. Being around for a couple millennia and being subjected to scientist/collector abuse for a couple centuries has made for some interesting things on our coins if we look closely enough. In this case, right or wrong, I tend to blame a waxy material applied to make the coin look better but using the theory that if a 'dab' would 'do' a ton would do better. The obvious culprit here is RenWax which really is a thing commonly overdone but it could as well be Johnson's floor wax. Nose Grease was a common material film era photo lab techs applied to negatives with minor base scratches and works on coins in some cases. Earwax? I had not thought of that one.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Baking soda used to polish the coin to a glitter? Possible. </p><p><br /></p><p>kirispupis, since you already have a lot of camera gear and the inclination to use it on coins, I would suggest you get a stereoscopic microscope with the added capability of adapting a camera via a third eye-tube. Mine does not have this camera port so I just use a stack of about 100mm worth of extension tubes on a 100mm lens. While the coin looks clean in a 'normal' photo, this 1 1/2 assaria of Philip II from Tomis shows waxy flakes (possibly skin cells) and salts adhered by grime. There are several pieces of red flocking that came from trays that once housed my collection and just plain old dust. Cleaning a coin well enough to take a photo at this scale (these are two full frame shots combined and reduced to fit here) is no easy task. The stereo microscope would help but it is easier to use a spot healing brush in postprocessing. This sample has not been 'decluttered' yet but is about as clean as I usually get a coin before shooting. I started working on a set of what I considered to be interesting coins with centration dimples (there are several varieties of these which I find fascinating). Whether I will follow through that to completion remains to be seen. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1326632[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7748571, member: 19463"]This post brings us to the verge of 'forensic numismatics'. I love technical numismatics or all kinds (except, possibly, cleaning) because it allows me to take photos that are not just passport/drivers license grade. Being around for a couple millennia and being subjected to scientist/collector abuse for a couple centuries has made for some interesting things on our coins if we look closely enough. In this case, right or wrong, I tend to blame a waxy material applied to make the coin look better but using the theory that if a 'dab' would 'do' a ton would do better. The obvious culprit here is RenWax which really is a thing commonly overdone but it could as well be Johnson's floor wax. Nose Grease was a common material film era photo lab techs applied to negatives with minor base scratches and works on coins in some cases. Earwax? I had not thought of that one.:angelic: Baking soda used to polish the coin to a glitter? Possible. kirispupis, since you already have a lot of camera gear and the inclination to use it on coins, I would suggest you get a stereoscopic microscope with the added capability of adapting a camera via a third eye-tube. Mine does not have this camera port so I just use a stack of about 100mm worth of extension tubes on a 100mm lens. While the coin looks clean in a 'normal' photo, this 1 1/2 assaria of Philip II from Tomis shows waxy flakes (possibly skin cells) and salts adhered by grime. There are several pieces of red flocking that came from trays that once housed my collection and just plain old dust. Cleaning a coin well enough to take a photo at this scale (these are two full frame shots combined and reduced to fit here) is no easy task. The stereo microscope would help but it is easier to use a spot healing brush in postprocessing. This sample has not been 'decluttered' yet but is about as clean as I usually get a coin before shooting. I started working on a set of what I considered to be interesting coins with centration dimples (there are several varieties of these which I find fascinating). Whether I will follow through that to completion remains to be seen. [ATTACH=full]1326632[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What's this white "stuff"?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...