Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 4841308, member: 105098&quot;]And apparently they did those slabs both ways:<img src="https://www.ngccoin.com/boards/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg313/Chrishjr/Chris%2520Coins/SMS%2520Quarters%2520-%2520Territory%2520set/2009DDistrictofColumbiasmaller.jpg&amp;key=cbd932af69d69298cdc3e45638850c5dfd21fe84aa50ae0b15971b3ce4c11ae5" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><img src="https://www.ngccoin.com/boards/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg313/Chrishjr/Chris%2520Coins/SSA50127.jpg&amp;key=27d82bb392ac82a32fe3fd35a9a61d5280e3502d9defc94e738542f9f5f54bd7" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>NGC called them all &quot;SMS&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think early on they called them &quot;MS&quot; with them labeled Satin finish on the slab, and around 2006, changed it to &quot;SP&quot; to differentiate it further. probably an internal disagreement started in 2005 over calling the satin mint set coins MS that resolved to being called SP in 2006.</p><p><br /></p><p>My personal opinion, I think they were trying to identify it with the TM&#039;ed Satin finish logo slabs originally and it didn&#039;t work out so well for the population census organization, so they changed it otherwise they all would be of the design and date and it&#039;s not the same finish.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in