Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2865045, member: 71723&quot;]Here&#039;s WHY I think it&#039;s at least a 66. 1) I can see no trace of bag marks or contact marks in any prime focal area, just toning spots. 2) It exhibits full &quot;ghosting&quot; around &quot;E PLURIBUS UNUM&quot; which is a remnant of metal flow occurring at the wing area on the other side. This is evidence of an unmessed with coin. 3) Always tough to see in ANY still photo, but I believe I see what evidence I can EVER see of superior flash and luster under these toning spots. With the caveat that I HATE grading from still photos (That&#039;s just the way I roll.), I see something here well better than a mundane 65.</p><p><br /></p><p>But wait, these pictures weren&#039;t taken by GSC, were they?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in