Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Arizona Jack, post: 659685, member: 9308&quot;]From the hits and surfaces, it looks as a decent 63-4ish S mint, most notably lack of luster, this is prolly the pic.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dont forget , these are some tough dates to grade, almost all examples show gem traits in one way or another.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To slide by as a gem, early S mint your coin has to rock. Take some better pics, let us see some luster and some mirrors......</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To be a true 65, 79-80-81 ( S ) mint Morgans have to be all there. And then some. No &quot; CC &quot; bump for these.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in