Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
What would you call a bowl impression ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="usmc60, post: 2380504, member: 76739"]Sir your advice is appreciated, but ever since my stroke and disability I'm on a very tight budget the money you suggest that I spend, I think my food medication and medical bills and just living bills and my priority not some quarter with a bowl impression. It is important to me to know what caused this bowl impression and I'll keep searching on the Internet until I find what caused it or who caused it. you presented your theory I presented one theory isn't that what the talk is about and someone else has another theory that's what's great about living in the great USA we are allowed opinions we may not all agree and that's okay again thank you for your advice.</p><p><br /></p><p>Don't be so happy. There is always some things we just don't know, like if Steve's press machine that makes the working dies was properly calibrated ? Improper calibration could result in a coin impression like the one on this coin, it would have to exceed the maximum pressure for this quarter will result in some kind of deformity. After Steve it goes to Tom. He inspects the die does the necessary detailing and if the die looks visually good you can only wonder if he actually laser inspects it or just preps it to be hardened, I don't even know if Tom's flash 500 has the laser measuring capabilities as the smart 500 does I can only hope someday an interviewer will ask these questions on the next interview at the mint. Earl don't feel left out it seems you're quite good at grinding these dies down to specifications. Keep up the good work, I believe we will know more about this coin anomaly as more of them get into circulation. like I'm trying to say lest just move on, it's only a quarter, PS since the mint does not have a job description for machinist that description is known as tool maker it would it be improper to call this a me coin (machinist error) it could possibly be a (TME) tool makers error. And it is possible I may have read it incorrectly about excessive pressure damage so I'll let you read it for your self. I would just like to know if the press was not calibrated and the press the working die and say 348 what would be the result of the overpressure on the working die Would be? See I still have a lot of questions[ATTACH=full]487878[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="usmc60, post: 2380504, member: 76739"]Sir your advice is appreciated, but ever since my stroke and disability I'm on a very tight budget the money you suggest that I spend, I think my food medication and medical bills and just living bills and my priority not some quarter with a bowl impression. It is important to me to know what caused this bowl impression and I'll keep searching on the Internet until I find what caused it or who caused it. you presented your theory I presented one theory isn't that what the talk is about and someone else has another theory that's what's great about living in the great USA we are allowed opinions we may not all agree and that's okay again thank you for your advice. Don't be so happy. There is always some things we just don't know, like if Steve's press machine that makes the working dies was properly calibrated ? Improper calibration could result in a coin impression like the one on this coin, it would have to exceed the maximum pressure for this quarter will result in some kind of deformity. After Steve it goes to Tom. He inspects the die does the necessary detailing and if the die looks visually good you can only wonder if he actually laser inspects it or just preps it to be hardened, I don't even know if Tom's flash 500 has the laser measuring capabilities as the smart 500 does I can only hope someday an interviewer will ask these questions on the next interview at the mint. Earl don't feel left out it seems you're quite good at grinding these dies down to specifications. Keep up the good work, I believe we will know more about this coin anomaly as more of them get into circulation. like I'm trying to say lest just move on, it's only a quarter, PS since the mint does not have a job description for machinist that description is known as tool maker it would it be improper to call this a me coin (machinist error) it could possibly be a (TME) tool makers error. And it is possible I may have read it incorrectly about excessive pressure damage so I'll let you read it for your self. I would just like to know if the press was not calibrated and the press the working die and say 348 what would be the result of the overpressure on the working die Would be? See I still have a lot of questions[ATTACH=full]487878[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
What would you call a bowl impression ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...