Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What would you bid on this damaged 1909-S VDB cent?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8281948, member: 24314"]AMEN.</p><p><br /></p><p>Decades ago, all that was needed to authenticate <b><font size="5">US coins </font></b>was a fluorescent light and a stereo microscope. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now I'm telling on <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie25" alt=":blackeye:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> myself. To the best of my knowledge (based on "returns for authentication mistakes") on coins I personally examined from 1972 to 1985, I only made two extremely <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie30" alt=":bucktooth:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> bad errors - both out of complacency! I missed an embossed mintmark on a Buffalo - once. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> And the first time the 1959 "Mule" was seen at the service, <b><span style="color: #b30000">it was sent out as a normal 1959 cent!</span></b> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie45" alt=":eggface:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie15" alt=":arghh:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie15" alt=":arghh:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Due to familiarity, it never dawned on us that it was special. That is until a news reporter called the office. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I like to tell the story of this coin in each authentication seminar to stress the need to be alert. Every coin is sent in for a reason.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now to Jack's point. As soon as TPGS had to make decisions on coins that were corroded, damaged, and had highly altered surfaces, authentication became much harder. Combine that with the highly deceptive fakes of today it is even harder. Now, throw in ancients and foreign coins that most professionals are less familiar with and forgetaboutit. The job is really hard today and we don't have the option of holding coins until we reach a decision. Furthermore, I cannot imagine how anyone who has not been examining the microscopic surfaces of coins for decades can even do it to a high percentage (99%) of accuracy! </p><p><br /></p><p>Thankfully, TPGS have always had help from consultants <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> and collectors<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> like Jack and his group to help get it right in the end.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8281948, member: 24314"]AMEN. Decades ago, all that was needed to authenticate [B][SIZE=5]US coins [/SIZE][/B]was a fluorescent light and a stereo microscope. :D Now I'm telling on :blackeye: myself. To the best of my knowledge (based on "returns for authentication mistakes") on coins I personally examined from 1972 to 1985, I only made two extremely :bucktooth: bad errors - both out of complacency! I missed an embossed mintmark on a Buffalo - once. :( And the first time the 1959 "Mule" was seen at the service, [B][COLOR=#b30000]it was sent out as a normal 1959 cent![/COLOR][/B] :facepalm::eggface: :arghh::arghh: Due to familiarity, it never dawned on us that it was special. That is until a news reporter called the office. :jawdrop: I like to tell the story of this coin in each authentication seminar to stress the need to be alert. Every coin is sent in for a reason. Now to Jack's point. As soon as TPGS had to make decisions on coins that were corroded, damaged, and had highly altered surfaces, authentication became much harder. Combine that with the highly deceptive fakes of today it is even harder. Now, throw in ancients and foreign coins that most professionals are less familiar with and forgetaboutit. The job is really hard today and we don't have the option of holding coins until we reach a decision. Furthermore, I cannot imagine how anyone who has not been examining the microscopic surfaces of coins for decades can even do it to a high percentage (99%) of accuracy! Thankfully, TPGS have always had help from consultants :bookworm: and collectors:bookworm: like Jack and his group to help get it right in the end.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What would you bid on this damaged 1909-S VDB cent?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...