Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 2162725, member: 4920&quot;]I asked him, not you, lol. But really, I wanted to see just one example of what he meant by &quot;light hairlines&quot; often knocking MS64s down to MS61.</p><p><br /></p><p>At any rate, on these three coins you show, I don&#039;t even need to see them in-hand, John. These are quality auction photos. All three coins are undergraded. Make them common-dates, and see it. They&#039;re not being graded on the same standards. These were held to higher standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here, give this the perusal. Note the same evidence of die-porousness on the forehead as on Jason&#039;s coin:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/50164253_1344969_2200.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/50164253_1344969_2200.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/50164253_1344969_2200.jpg</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Note the link, CoinFacts, and the grade, PCGS MS64. I agree with the grade. I&#039;d tell you what I think happened, but only if it were my last day on CoinTalk, lol, so I shan&#039;t.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in