Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1098698, member: 112&quot;]Again I would agree with Reynolds&#039; grade of 50. The coin has even and obvious wear on virtually all the high points of both the obv and rev as well as light wear in the fields. Now some may argue that it&#039;s not wear but a weak strike, but it isn&#039;t. The coin is actually very well struck as indicated by the sharpness and clarity of all the details and thus what we see is the result of wear not a weak strike. Wear is also indicated by the remains of grime in the recesses. That also indicates that the coin has been dipped, which would account for somewhat subdued luster.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for what PCGS will say - it will no doubt be higher than 50 but it will not be justified.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in