Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 355929, member: 4626&quot;]As far as I can tell the width of the actual printed portion of both bills is pretty close to identical, one was just cut at a slightly wider point.&nbsp; Can easily be explained by normal variations that occur in the cutting process when individual bills are cut out from the uncut sheets.&nbsp; The wider bill might just not have been cut as precisely and/or the narrower bill was just trimmed more closely due to a small tear (or just normal variation).</p><p><br /></p><p>The printed portion of the 1953 A does look slightly narrower (<i>VERY</i> slightly, the printed portion isn&#039;t quite lined up either so the zoom makes the difference look more than it actually is) than the 1953 but still within what looks like a normal variance in the printing process.&nbsp; Multiple printing plates are used for each new series; it wouldn&#039;t be unusual for one to be slightly off in comparison to a different series, but not by very much.&nbsp; It looks within tolerance to me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in