Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 3262301, member: 15309&quot;]Virtually nobody holds your insane position on toning.&nbsp; The only guy who comes close, is Ricko, and people think he is a joke, just like they view you.&nbsp; Toning is an inevitable course of nature, a fact that is accepted by everyone not in the lunatic fringe, of which you are the leader.&nbsp; Since when do trends last from the late 80&#039;s until present?&nbsp; Last time I checked, that isn&#039;t a trend, 30 years is a stable market.&nbsp; And if it were true that people hated toning, why do rainbow toned coins command such a premium?&nbsp; Oh wait, I forgot, cue the evil marketers, but again, anyone who disagrees with you is relegated to a grifter or snake oil salesman.&nbsp; Yawn-yawn!</p><p><br /></p><p>Furthermore, you are on record on this very forum saying that you make exceptions for early 60&#039;s proof Jefferson Nickels.&nbsp; Why is that I wonder?&nbsp; Oh, because you own some 60&#039;s proof sets, and you didn&#039;t artificially tone them, yet they still have amazing toning.&nbsp; So in that narrow field, you make an exception to your &quot;toning is damage, and toning is fake&quot; narrative.&nbsp; You can&#039;t condemn the toning as fake and you secretly think the toning looks great.&nbsp; Face it, you are simply a bloviating fraud seeking the attention of the members of this forum, in your perpetual quest to be a numismatic bigshot.</p><p><br /></p><p>And why would a guy with a Twitter account be so anti Facebook?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in