Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What the heck are you thinking, ANACS?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="ToughCOINS, post: 2823992, member: 20480"]Your reference that all letters of LIBERTY be present to satisfy the requirements of the VF grade is incomplete . . . even going back 40 years or more.</p><p><br /></p><p>Prefacing the grading criteria for all of the major US coin types in the the 1970 Edition of Photograde, page 11 specifically states, "<b>IMPORTANT: </b>The pictures in this book were chosen to represent the average of a particular grade or type. Naturally, variations in variety or striking must be taken into consideration . . . The reader must average the plus and minus factors when comparing a coin to the average picture . . . When grading a coin, take into consideration all of the features of each side - not just an isolated weak spot which was not a result of wear" (credit given to the most honored author, James F. Ruddy).</p><p><br /></p><p>Thus, for all series and not just seated halves in particular, the application of some judgment in deciding how a coin grades based on all of its attributes - including the accounting for weak strike - has been standard practice for many years, and is not some recent introduction by the grading services.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is widely recognized that many issues in the Seated Half Dollar series are poorly struck in this area - the CC issues included - and therefore one should look to the balance of the coin before assigning a grade. ANACS obviously failed to consider this.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="ToughCOINS, post: 2823992, member: 20480"]Your reference that all letters of LIBERTY be present to satisfy the requirements of the VF grade is incomplete . . . even going back 40 years or more. Prefacing the grading criteria for all of the major US coin types in the the 1970 Edition of Photograde, page 11 specifically states, "[B]IMPORTANT: [/B]The pictures in this book were chosen to represent the average of a particular grade or type. Naturally, variations in variety or striking must be taken into consideration . . . The reader must average the plus and minus factors when comparing a coin to the average picture . . . When grading a coin, take into consideration all of the features of each side - not just an isolated weak spot which was not a result of wear" (credit given to the most honored author, James F. Ruddy). Thus, for all series and not just seated halves in particular, the application of some judgment in deciding how a coin grades based on all of its attributes - including the accounting for weak strike - has been standard practice for many years, and is not some recent introduction by the grading services. It is widely recognized that many issues in the Seated Half Dollar series are poorly struck in this area - the CC issues included - and therefore one should look to the balance of the coin before assigning a grade. ANACS obviously failed to consider this.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What the heck are you thinking, ANACS?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...