Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 7605208, member: 21705&quot;]Back to OP. My best analysis from the photo is a lamination broken away before the strike but with a retained fragment which is what looks like an internal CUD, but isn&#039;t.</p><p><br /></p><p>ps I think it has better details than a typical AU55. They sometimes give it a straight grade at what they believe to be market value rather than a details grade that is higher. Essentially they believe the market would deduct for this lamination error. I don&#039;t necessarily agree. They probably get less blowback from an undervaluation than full evaluation if a buyer does not recognize it as a mint error.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, I don&#039;t believe they designate a mint error unless you pay for for it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in