Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What is the significance of a countermark like this?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 8398563, member: 85693"]Digging up this thread because I got another Minerva countermark for Antioch by Domitian. This one is on a Titus host, which appears to be scarce; at least I was unable to find another one. RPC has (63) examples of this countermark on hosts from Claudius to Domitian, but none on a Titus. Wildwinds, acsearch, etc. didn't turn up any either. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is the first of the "large" SC types that I have with this countermark; the other two posted above are the small types (as and semis?). </p><p><br /></p><p>Here it is: </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1490152[/ATTACH] </p><p><b>Titus / Domitian Æ 28</b></p><p><b>(c. 79-81 A.D. / cm 83-96 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Syria, Seleucis & Pieria Antiochia ad Orontem </b></p><p>T CAESAR IMP PON[T] (first T faint, located at 6 o'clock), laureate head right / Large S•C, laurel wreath around, pellet top. </p><p>RPC II 2014; McAlee 384(b/c?); BMC 235; Wruck 102. </p><p>(13.63 grams / 28 x 27 mm)</p><p>eBay June 2022 </p><p><b>Countermark: </b>Athena/Minerva in 6 x 4 mm rectangle, Howgego 245; RPC 368. (none on Titus in RPC from (63) examples).</p><p>"The connection of Minerva with Domitian suggests that this is an Imperial countermark. There can be little doubt that it was applied at Antioch between 83 and 96 A.D. It did not have a denominational significance because it occurs on</p><p>both denominations of the SC series" Howgego</p><p><b>Scarcity: </b> RPC has (63) examples of Countermark 368, all for Antioch SC issues, but none on a Titus host coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mine appears to have an obverse die-match to one of the RPC examples: </p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1490151[/ATTACH] </b></p><p><b>Die-Match:</b> Obverse die appears to match this</p><p>specimen from RPC: Coin no. 5 of RPC II 2014; Bibliothèque nationale de France,</p><p>Paris (France) Inventory No. 1973/99</p><p><br /></p><p>For anybody interested in these countermarks, since the last time I posted one of these, I finally figured out how to negotiate RPC's countermark database. Here are three pages worth of the Athena/Minerva type in this thread (RPC says it is Athena; a search for Minerva brings up nothing - the RPC database is touchy this way): <a href="https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/countermark/368" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/countermark/368" rel="nofollow">https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/countermark/368</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 8398563, member: 85693"]Digging up this thread because I got another Minerva countermark for Antioch by Domitian. This one is on a Titus host, which appears to be scarce; at least I was unable to find another one. RPC has (63) examples of this countermark on hosts from Claudius to Domitian, but none on a Titus. Wildwinds, acsearch, etc. didn't turn up any either. This is the first of the "large" SC types that I have with this countermark; the other two posted above are the small types (as and semis?). Here it is: [ATTACH=full]1490152[/ATTACH] [B]Titus / Domitian Æ 28 (c. 79-81 A.D. / cm 83-96 A.D.) Syria, Seleucis & Pieria Antiochia ad Orontem [/B] T CAESAR IMP PON[T] (first T faint, located at 6 o'clock), laureate head right / Large S•C, laurel wreath around, pellet top. RPC II 2014; McAlee 384(b/c?); BMC 235; Wruck 102. (13.63 grams / 28 x 27 mm) eBay June 2022 [B]Countermark: [/B]Athena/Minerva in 6 x 4 mm rectangle, Howgego 245; RPC 368. (none on Titus in RPC from (63) examples). "The connection of Minerva with Domitian suggests that this is an Imperial countermark. There can be little doubt that it was applied at Antioch between 83 and 96 A.D. It did not have a denominational significance because it occurs on both denominations of the SC series" Howgego [B]Scarcity: [/B] RPC has (63) examples of Countermark 368, all for Antioch SC issues, but none on a Titus host coin. [B][/B] Mine appears to have an obverse die-match to one of the RPC examples: [B] [ATTACH=full]1490151[/ATTACH] Die-Match:[/B] Obverse die appears to match this specimen from RPC: Coin no. 5 of RPC II 2014; Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris (France) Inventory No. 1973/99 For anybody interested in these countermarks, since the last time I posted one of these, I finally figured out how to negotiate RPC's countermark database. Here are three pages worth of the Athena/Minerva type in this thread (RPC says it is Athena; a search for Minerva brings up nothing - the RPC database is touchy this way): [URL]https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/countermark/368[/URL][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What is the significance of a countermark like this?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...