Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
What is the diffrence of an gold certificate and a 1928 federal reserve note?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Jamericon, post: 1259580, member: 18294"]Don't confuse being redeemable for gold (practical use) with being legal tender (legal use). They are not the same thing.</p><p><br /></p><p>Until 1933, only gold certificates were legal tender for all debts. United States notes were legal tender for some debts, and all other currency were not legal tender. That is the definition according to the laws authorizing each class of note.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, being redeemable for gold muddied the picture. FRNs and USNs were redeemable for gold coin, and therefore on par with gold certificates. Thus they were de facto legal tender because of this relationship, and holdings of GCs, FRNs, or USNs were just as good as gold.</p><p><br /></p><p>Legal tender had to do with what the Treasury would accept for specific debts owed to it. Federal Reserve notes, by law, were only receivable by the Federal Reserve banks and their member banks. If you tried to pay a debt to the Treasury in Federal Reserve notes, but they required legal tender, they could deny your offer. </p><p><br /></p><p>I need to correct my first post: Federal Reserve notes were backed by at least 40% with gold, not 100%.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Jamericon, post: 1259580, member: 18294"]Don't confuse being redeemable for gold (practical use) with being legal tender (legal use). They are not the same thing. Until 1933, only gold certificates were legal tender for all debts. United States notes were legal tender for some debts, and all other currency were not legal tender. That is the definition according to the laws authorizing each class of note. However, being redeemable for gold muddied the picture. FRNs and USNs were redeemable for gold coin, and therefore on par with gold certificates. Thus they were de facto legal tender because of this relationship, and holdings of GCs, FRNs, or USNs were just as good as gold. Legal tender had to do with what the Treasury would accept for specific debts owed to it. Federal Reserve notes, by law, were only receivable by the Federal Reserve banks and their member banks. If you tried to pay a debt to the Treasury in Federal Reserve notes, but they required legal tender, they could deny your offer. I need to correct my first post: Federal Reserve notes were backed by at least 40% with gold, not 100%.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
What is the diffrence of an gold certificate and a 1928 federal reserve note?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...