Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 6391672, member: 112&quot;]The problem is there is absolutely NO WAY to distinguish one cause of wear from any other cause of wear. Or, when and where it occurred. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If your smiley is used with sarcasm in mind, well, I get it. But, you also have to understand that for 20 years, what you&#039;re describing is basically what occurred with the vast majority of coins graded by the TPGs. With business strike coins in particular, across the board of denominations, a 67 was about as high as a grade ever went - and there were very few 67s. For the most part, anything over a 67 was almost non existent. 65s and 66s were certainly more common but they didn&#039;t exist in overly large numbers. </p><p><br /></p><p>The point of course is yes, they knew it from day one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in