Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What is Money?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 12831, member: 57463"]In the topic, Counterfeits, satootoko wrote:</p><p>"Fantasies are coins produced for other purposes, including non-existent governments (Sealand for example), throwing from floats during Mardi Gras parades, unofficially issued proposals for real coins, advertising tokens of all sorts, etc.</p><p>"Notgeld. Even though this German word literally means "emergency money", it makes a good category title for semi-official monetary issues, often put out by cities, provinces, etc.; but also by private parties, to assuage shortages in official currency/coins. Conder Tokens, Hard Times Tokens, children's game coins, gambling tokens, and similar coins fall in this category. They are "fake" because they are not "money", even though they often perform the function of money."</p><p><br /></p><p>This raises several important questions about how we define things in numismatics. </p><p><br /></p><p>It is a common "default value" in numismatics that we call "money" only those issues of "governments" (however defined). Yet, as satootoko points out, so-called non-money objects do, indeed, perform the function of money. If something performs the function of money, then why is it _not_ money?</p><p><br /></p><p>Apply the same standard, say, to education or healthcare or (most recently in the news) space travel. Are only public schools real schools, with private schools being "non-schools that perform the function of schools"? Is Rutan's SpaceShipOne, a "non-rocket that performs the function of a rocket" just because it did not come from a government?</p><p><br /></p><p>And what is a "government"? Satootoko cited Sealand. Sealand, Hutt River Principality, and other micronations are as valid as any other state. The Vatican has only a few hundred actual citizens and perhaps 1500 other "guest workers." We recognize the Vatican as a legitimate government -- Euros and all; Pope speaks to the U.N.; etc. -- but we deny this to other micronations. Why?</p><p><br /></p><p>I have read once through each, two books by E. C. Riegel, The New Approach to Freedom and Flight From Inflation. Riegel makes a strong case to show that in terms of pure accounting, money is only created when a buyer accepts a seller's offer. Riegel goes on to show that strictly speaking by definition governments really do _NOT_ create money, only money-like objects that perform the function of money when used by persons.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hard Times Tokens, Conders, scrip, the entire matrix of commercial counters are within the context of numismatics. They are all money.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mardi Gras Doubloons and other fantasies are in a different class entirely. (Some Mardi Gras Doubloons are, in fact money objects because they are -- on rare occasions -- tokens, good-fors. ) </p><p><br /></p><p>I have been involved in a "community currency" project here in Traverse City, Michigan. About 30 cities have their own local currencies, and in every case I have researched, these are created by non-government associations of participating individuals and businesses. In the Riegel model, these people create money with their transactions and use these community currencies as their preferred accounting tools.</p><p><br /></p><p>As a numismatist, I consider checks, drafts, stock certificates, banknotes, coins, and all the rest to be equally valid as forms of money. Some of these I have collected with more interest and some not at all. My "aesthetics of economics" (if you will) does not define money, only my preferences for studying some of it. </p><p><br /></p><p>Comments, questions, criticisms or suggestions?</p><p><br /></p><p>Michael[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 12831, member: 57463"]In the topic, Counterfeits, satootoko wrote: "Fantasies are coins produced for other purposes, including non-existent governments (Sealand for example), throwing from floats during Mardi Gras parades, unofficially issued proposals for real coins, advertising tokens of all sorts, etc. "Notgeld. Even though this German word literally means "emergency money", it makes a good category title for semi-official monetary issues, often put out by cities, provinces, etc.; but also by private parties, to assuage shortages in official currency/coins. Conder Tokens, Hard Times Tokens, children's game coins, gambling tokens, and similar coins fall in this category. They are "fake" because they are not "money", even though they often perform the function of money." This raises several important questions about how we define things in numismatics. It is a common "default value" in numismatics that we call "money" only those issues of "governments" (however defined). Yet, as satootoko points out, so-called non-money objects do, indeed, perform the function of money. If something performs the function of money, then why is it _not_ money? Apply the same standard, say, to education or healthcare or (most recently in the news) space travel. Are only public schools real schools, with private schools being "non-schools that perform the function of schools"? Is Rutan's SpaceShipOne, a "non-rocket that performs the function of a rocket" just because it did not come from a government? And what is a "government"? Satootoko cited Sealand. Sealand, Hutt River Principality, and other micronations are as valid as any other state. The Vatican has only a few hundred actual citizens and perhaps 1500 other "guest workers." We recognize the Vatican as a legitimate government -- Euros and all; Pope speaks to the U.N.; etc. -- but we deny this to other micronations. Why? I have read once through each, two books by E. C. Riegel, The New Approach to Freedom and Flight From Inflation. Riegel makes a strong case to show that in terms of pure accounting, money is only created when a buyer accepts a seller's offer. Riegel goes on to show that strictly speaking by definition governments really do _NOT_ create money, only money-like objects that perform the function of money when used by persons. Hard Times Tokens, Conders, scrip, the entire matrix of commercial counters are within the context of numismatics. They are all money. Mardi Gras Doubloons and other fantasies are in a different class entirely. (Some Mardi Gras Doubloons are, in fact money objects because they are -- on rare occasions -- tokens, good-fors. ) I have been involved in a "community currency" project here in Traverse City, Michigan. About 30 cities have their own local currencies, and in every case I have researched, these are created by non-government associations of participating individuals and businesses. In the Riegel model, these people create money with their transactions and use these community currencies as their preferred accounting tools. As a numismatist, I consider checks, drafts, stock certificates, banknotes, coins, and all the rest to be equally valid as forms of money. Some of these I have collected with more interest and some not at all. My "aesthetics of economics" (if you will) does not define money, only my preferences for studying some of it. Comments, questions, criticisms or suggestions? Michael[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What is Money?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...