Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
What is "Mainstream" Collecting?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 36465, member: 57463"]In the reiterating Investment topic, Longnine009 referred to "mainstream" collecting as opposed to "topicals." I think that intuitively, we might all <u>think</u> that we understand what that means, but if you stop to weigh it out, it loses some definition. </p><p><br /></p><p>Coin boards ("Whitman" style, not websites) go back to the 1930s. Forty or fifty years ago, when the statistical median agers were kids, they could fill much of a Lincoln Cent or Buffalo Nickel board from pocket change and buy the few semi-keys from allowance or yardwork or paper route money, dreaming of the keys, which they might have bought before cars and girls interrupted their collecting. We tend to see Late 19th and Early 20th Century U.S. Type fractional and minor coins (50-cent pieces down to cents), as the "mainstream." I am not sure that this makes sense any more -- it might not have made sense for over 20 years.</p><p><br /></p><p>First of all, this board in particular, but many others as well, have an <u>international</u> audience. Buffalo Nickels are not in the mainstream of collecting for people in the U.K. or Finland. We have a global hobby. </p><p><br /></p><p>In those other places, there must have been some similar "mainstream" in the previous generation. They have (to quote an Americanism) "gone the way of the buffalo." </p><p><br /></p><p>In America, when collecting exploded and imploded about 1980, there were already many ways to assemble sets and many kinds of sets to consider. VAMs were invented. (Van Allen and Mallis, authors of the standard book on Morgan Dollar Mistakes that seem collectible.) Bankwrapped Rolls became a hot item. </p><p><br /></p><p>There is still a tendency to assemble sets by Date and Mintmark. Collecting by topic seemed more appropriate to stamp collectors, philately being about a generation ahead of numismatics. (It certainly melted down sooner in the wake of phony commemoratives.) However, over the last few years, I have seen more and more numismatic collectors drawn to topics.</p><p><br /></p><p>"Topic" is a pretty broad term. It is easy to think in terms of ships, planes, insects, flowers, etc., as the subject on a coin. However, Roger deWardt Lane has an electronic presentation (Web and CD) called "Brother Can You Spare a Dime?" (<a href="http://www.geocities.com/dewardt/brother.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.geocities.com/dewardt/brother.html" rel="nofollow">www.geocities.com/dewardt/brother.html</a>) about "dime size coins of the world." Even back in the 1970s, there were American collectors of crowns and half-crowns, the large dollar-size silver coins of the world. I read about collectors who pursue the smallest coins in the world, either by diameter or denomination. So, those are other "topics."</p><p><br /></p><p>We tend to segregate coins from banknotes from medals. However, my interest in aviation encompasses all of them as a single topic -- and to them I add cancelled covers, postcards, etc. (I have a postcard cancelled both ways on the Hindenberg, for instance.) I wrote this up for StudentPilot.Com as "Your Personal Aviation Museum: Collectibles as Historical Evidence." (<a href="http://www.studentpilot.com/articles/aviation_articles/article.php?aviation_id=121" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.studentpilot.com/articles/aviation_articles/article.php?aviation_id=121" rel="nofollow">http://www.studentpilot.com/articles/aviation_articles/article.php?aviation_id=121</a>)</p><p><br /></p><p>So, what, if anything, is the "mainstream" of numismatics?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 36465, member: 57463"]In the reiterating Investment topic, Longnine009 referred to "mainstream" collecting as opposed to "topicals." I think that intuitively, we might all [U]think[/U] that we understand what that means, but if you stop to weigh it out, it loses some definition. Coin boards ("Whitman" style, not websites) go back to the 1930s. Forty or fifty years ago, when the statistical median agers were kids, they could fill much of a Lincoln Cent or Buffalo Nickel board from pocket change and buy the few semi-keys from allowance or yardwork or paper route money, dreaming of the keys, which they might have bought before cars and girls interrupted their collecting. We tend to see Late 19th and Early 20th Century U.S. Type fractional and minor coins (50-cent pieces down to cents), as the "mainstream." I am not sure that this makes sense any more -- it might not have made sense for over 20 years. First of all, this board in particular, but many others as well, have an [U]international[/U] audience. Buffalo Nickels are not in the mainstream of collecting for people in the U.K. or Finland. We have a global hobby. In those other places, there must have been some similar "mainstream" in the previous generation. They have (to quote an Americanism) "gone the way of the buffalo." In America, when collecting exploded and imploded about 1980, there were already many ways to assemble sets and many kinds of sets to consider. VAMs were invented. (Van Allen and Mallis, authors of the standard book on Morgan Dollar Mistakes that seem collectible.) Bankwrapped Rolls became a hot item. There is still a tendency to assemble sets by Date and Mintmark. Collecting by topic seemed more appropriate to stamp collectors, philately being about a generation ahead of numismatics. (It certainly melted down sooner in the wake of phony commemoratives.) However, over the last few years, I have seen more and more numismatic collectors drawn to topics. "Topic" is a pretty broad term. It is easy to think in terms of ships, planes, insects, flowers, etc., as the subject on a coin. However, Roger deWardt Lane has an electronic presentation (Web and CD) called "Brother Can You Spare a Dime?" ([url]www.geocities.com/dewardt/brother.html[/url]) about "dime size coins of the world." Even back in the 1970s, there were American collectors of crowns and half-crowns, the large dollar-size silver coins of the world. I read about collectors who pursue the smallest coins in the world, either by diameter or denomination. So, those are other "topics." We tend to segregate coins from banknotes from medals. However, my interest in aviation encompasses all of them as a single topic -- and to them I add cancelled covers, postcards, etc. (I have a postcard cancelled both ways on the Hindenberg, for instance.) I wrote this up for StudentPilot.Com as "Your Personal Aviation Museum: Collectibles as Historical Evidence." ([url]http://www.studentpilot.com/articles/aviation_articles/article.php?aviation_id=121[/url]) So, what, if anything, is the "mainstream" of numismatics?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
What is "Mainstream" Collecting?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...