Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 4771552, member: 26302&quot;]Not true. It is a case of never knowing, but all research would say you are incorrect. Its so well documented as to not really be challenged that consumers will lower consumption/willingness to pay of something with adverse labeling, (in this case no CAC), while increase consumption of positive labeling, (CAC label). So, the fact the hobby bought into the bean is definitionally proving non-CAC coins lost money. Since it DID happen, there is no knowing how much. Maybe they were flat but WOULD HAVE gone up 5%, maybe its variable by series, by price point, etc. I have no idea, but basic consumer modeling proves that it DID HAPPEN. </p><p><br /></p><p>Again, I do not know if planned this way or not. I do find it funny how CAC spends THOUSANDS of dollars running ads how CAC does not add value to a coin. Are they aware of this and trying to get ahead of collector opinion of what happened to their coin&#039;s value because of CAC?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in