Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Virginian, post: 4858930, member: 27579&quot;]That wasn&#039;t &quot;fat fingers.&quot;&nbsp; It was atrocious.&nbsp; And if you are going to lecture someone about English, it behooves you to make sure that said lecture is written in good English form, or you risk coming off as an arrogant know-nothing.&nbsp; Your post wasn&#039;t even close.&nbsp; I didn&#039;t even point out the obvious typos, because that was not the point.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for not &quot;<i>understand</i>[ing] <i>the legal ramifications of what you are writing</i>&quot; . . . perhaps not.&nbsp; I do hold a J.D. <i>magna cum laude</i> from Georgetown and have been practicing for more than 25 years, but I&#039;ve never tried a case involving counterfeiting.&nbsp; So I certainly will admit I could learn more about that aspect of the law.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, I believe this thread asked for an English definition of &quot;counterfeit&quot; and not &quot;the legal ramifications&quot; of counterfeiting, which would definitely vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, based on statute and case law.&nbsp;&nbsp; I think I have provided a pretty good definition.&nbsp; I think that you . . . haven&#039;t.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in