Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2864987, member: 71723&quot;]I feel this has been widely known in the hobby since what seems like forever:</p><p><br /></p><p>1) Obviousness. An error that requires high magnification to see will always suffer in value.</p><p>2) Unusualness. &quot;Same stuff, different year&quot; depresses value.</p><p>3) Radicalness. I fit won&#039;t fit it a normal holder, it&#039;s gonna go up in value.</p><p>4) Escape from Hobby. If it makes general media, it goes up in value.</p><p><br /></p><p>And best of all, if more people want one than there are pieces around, it gets valuable. If almost nobody cares, it&#039;s a loser. Supply, and especially DEMAND.</p><p><br /></p><p>Bottom line? Throwing a gazillion power of a digital microscope at pocket change is NOT anybody&#039;s path to riches. Sorry, Ken Potter, it just isn&#039;t. It may sell books, which is good for Ken Potter, but, well, you know.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in