Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1416888, member: 26302&quot;]But these are laws to prosecute people with. Therefor, it has to be describing the ACT that could be PUNISHABLE. Big difference between that and what I am asking about.</p><p><br /></p><p>I guess I am not trying to ask what legal case we could build, but what others classify coins as. Personally I am with Hontania. I recognize various types of coins; </p><p><br /></p><p>1. Original</p><p>2. Contemporary counterfeits, (made at the time to be spent, collectible today)</p><p>3. Artistic reproductions, (Paduan replicas, the mint in AR that used to strike coins)</p><p>4. Counterfeits. Everything else, made to fool collectors. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is simply the definitions I, and many others, use. I just wanted to talk about it and see if I was simply losing it, since in some discussions this definition seems to have been foreign to many.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, if someone wishes to argue that something is an artistic reproduction versus counterfeit, then I am open to that. It was simply the definitions that people were throwing around of what constitutes a counterfeit coin. If people disagree with this classification I would love to hear about it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris</p><p><br /></p><p>Btw, I am not ruling out the idea that someone could immune from the verb counterfeiting, and still be creating a counterfeit coin. They could be two different things.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in