Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What does "rare" mean, for an ancient coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Cherd, post: 8538158, member: 24754"]Words like this obviously have general meaning in ancient coins, like Gordian III is "Common" while Gordian II is "Rare". These things also apply to individual coin types, however, the meaning isn't definitive unless somebody defines it in a manner that's universally accepted. So far as I know, these two things in combination have not happened. But, obviously, regardless of definition, if only 1 is known then it would qualify as rare at a minimum.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'd say that the reason that these things aren't standardized, heavily publicized, or expensive is because most collectors aren't all that concerned about it. For instance, when it comes to Volusian, I simply want the most aesthetically pleasing example that I can afford. While a "unique" example would be cool in a secondary sense, that kind of thing doesn't override the primary objectives.</p><p><br /></p><p>Rarity of a specific type would matter to people with highly focused collections, like those of an individual emperor for instance. Then, like you said, it comes down to the person that's on the coin. If you had a unique variety of Augustus or Caesar, then that would be a big deal because there are a large number of collectors with that focus. Volusian, not so much.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Cherd, post: 8538158, member: 24754"]Words like this obviously have general meaning in ancient coins, like Gordian III is "Common" while Gordian II is "Rare". These things also apply to individual coin types, however, the meaning isn't definitive unless somebody defines it in a manner that's universally accepted. So far as I know, these two things in combination have not happened. But, obviously, regardless of definition, if only 1 is known then it would qualify as rare at a minimum. I'd say that the reason that these things aren't standardized, heavily publicized, or expensive is because most collectors aren't all that concerned about it. For instance, when it comes to Volusian, I simply want the most aesthetically pleasing example that I can afford. While a "unique" example would be cool in a secondary sense, that kind of thing doesn't override the primary objectives. Rarity of a specific type would matter to people with highly focused collections, like those of an individual emperor for instance. Then, like you said, it comes down to the person that's on the coin. If you had a unique variety of Augustus or Caesar, then that would be a big deal because there are a large number of collectors with that focus. Volusian, not so much.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
What does "rare" mean, for an ancient coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...