Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 2654551, member: 44316&quot;]I prefer the solution mentioned by Doug. </p><p>Hypothetically, if there was a bidder at 1500, you at 2200, and a non-paying bidder at 2400, you should not have had to pay 2200, rather 1600 or maybe 1700. Only if there was actually a different bidder at 2000 should you have had to pay 2200. </p><p><br /></p><p>Otherwise non-paying bidders would drive the prices up above what would have resulted without them. That is not fair.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in