Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cladking, post: 502703, member: 68&quot;]I really don&#039;t have a lot of experience searching rolls but I do pay attention to the coins I&#039;ve seen in circulation and have probably searched around ten rolls of each date but very few from later years.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve looked at a lot of mint sets and there&#039;s often a lot of correlation between quality in these and quality in rolls.&nbsp; Other times there is little correlation.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>One of the toughest to find even half decent in mint sets is the &#039;79-D.&nbsp; These are all scratched up.&nbsp; All the &#039;68-P are spotted in sets.&nbsp; The &#039;84 is usually corroded and usually has very poor surfaces.&nbsp; The &#039;81-P is rarely gemmy but does come clean.&nbsp; These have rough uneven surfaces.&nbsp; The &#039;72-D comes exceedingly PL and gemmy but strikes are never full.&nbsp; The &#039;72-S is a little tougher but comes nicer.&nbsp; Some &#039;88-D&#039;s in mint sets look like branch mint proofs.&nbsp; &#039;89-D&#039;s have zinc exposed on the reverse where it was stripped off the side of the lettering in the strike.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>In rolls I just don&#039;t have enough experience to feel competent to answer though would say I don&#039;t see any real problems with your list.&nbsp; The &#039;78 and &#039;74-S do come very nice in the sets but the &#039;78 is scarce.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in