Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Midas, post: 52637, member: 2761&quot;]There was a good reason to come out with SMS sets in 1965, 1966 and 1967.&nbsp; Reason?&nbsp; The mint made no PROOF sets and collectors were faced with coins without mint marks.&nbsp; They wanted to buy something!!</p><p><br /></p><p>Now this is the other end of the spectrum!&nbsp; Business strikes, Proof Strikes and now Satin Strikes...oh my!&nbsp; I am not happy as I used to look forward to the plastic bags from both Denver and Philadelphia.&nbsp; I kept my Lincolns in the plastic square bag (cut out) and stuck them in a 2x2 with an Avery Label.&nbsp; This is how I filled my slots for the recent dates.&nbsp; Also, I waited till the end of the year to buy a MS67 or better PCGS SAC $1.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I figured that strikes coming in the Mint Sets should be better than business strikes.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Now they changed the rules and I can see it now...I will need a 2005-P+D business strike,&nbsp; a 2005-S Proof, <b>and</b> a 2005-P and D Satin Finish (SF) to complete the year for just the freakin&#039; SAC dollar.&nbsp; <img src="http://bestsmileys.com/angry2/10.gif" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in