Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 2144283, member: 19250&quot;]Well I must say As Roosevelt&nbsp; dime collector I was tempted.&nbsp; However&nbsp; I only collect 46 through&nbsp; 64.&nbsp; As for the proofs not interested&nbsp; unless they fall between&nbsp; 46-64. This series&nbsp; has lasted way to long. As has the Jefferson&nbsp; nickel that I also collect,the Washington&nbsp; quarter . Half dollars as well as dollar&nbsp; coins are a dying&nbsp; breed.&nbsp; </p><p>Now if I were to expand into the clad years of Roosevelt&#039;s&nbsp; as a variety&nbsp; collector&nbsp; I could not settle for anything&nbsp; less than the years with the missing&nbsp; mint marks. That are so expensive&nbsp; to me it&#039;s&nbsp; not worth it.&nbsp; </p><p>I have a Jefferson&nbsp; 71 s no s in Proof 67 deep camo I love to sell. As at one point it was a had to have item, now it&#039;s a white elephant&nbsp; to me. Yes it&#039;s&nbsp; a pretty coin&nbsp; but&nbsp; way under the radar of most collectors . Plus does not count in a registry&nbsp; set.</p><p>I&#039;m&nbsp;&nbsp; sure these new dimes are going to be pretty. As like most new releases&nbsp; will be hot, go to Luke warm,then just be oh yeah that one of those dimes.</p><p>I personally&nbsp; believe&nbsp; if the mint wanted to really shake up the numismatic world, they redesign&nbsp; our coinage to be more pleasing . Get rid of dead Presidents&nbsp; and revisit Americana.</p><p>Some may say that train of thought is a move backwards.</p><p>I believe it be a move to give us pride in our coined money,and jump start numismatics&nbsp; to the next level.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in