Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
What do YOU think is an undervalued series?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 4084710, member: 36248"]Not too long ago, most collectors hated and/or ignored clad Ikes. I have fond memories of those coins when I was a boy. For some reason (I would guess as an "investment"), the owner of a Carpet company my mother was the bookkeepper for bought several large bags of the Ike coins, and kept them in a vault along with the cash receivables through the late 80's into the mid 90's. When I would visit my mother at work, or stay home from school sick, he would give me one of the coins. In fact, this may be my origin story of how I got into coins at a very early age, but I honestly don't remember exactly how, so I can't say for sure. They were big and cool looking to a kid who was around 7 years old.</p><p><br /></p><p>As an adult collector getting back into the hobby I decided they were ugly. Big modern ugly crap.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then at some point, after being in the hobby again for a few years, I suddenly changed my mind again. I am fairly certain it was due to my CAC Type set, and the sudden and unexpected decision of <a href="https://coinweek.com/education/coin-grading/cac-to-accept-eisenhower-dollars/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://coinweek.com/education/coin-grading/cac-to-accept-eisenhower-dollars/" rel="nofollow">CAC accepting Ikes around 2012</a>. I bought a few, submitted them, and was going to keep one in my set. Well, low-and-behold, holding them in my hands again, they looked big and cool to me. I've thought long and hard about what it is that made me so dislike the coins, and in the end, I think its because they photograph poorly, the design just looks big and ugly and simplistic, and when I would view them online, I had a negative reaction. It probably was a bit of snobbery too. But in hand, these coins were attractive and brought back the fond memories. </p><p><br /></p><p>Well, with CAC accepting the coins, others started taking notice. And while I am sure they are still a pariah coin for a lot of people, if you look at the pricing for high grade clad examples, it's doubtful people would say they are still undervalued. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am posting this as an example of what can happen to undervalued and underappreciated series. They can suddenly become cool again due to things like Registry sets, CAC inclusion, and evolving collector sentiments.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe some of the other examples in this thread will likewise experience a boost out of the bargain bins.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1064824[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 4084710, member: 36248"]Not too long ago, most collectors hated and/or ignored clad Ikes. I have fond memories of those coins when I was a boy. For some reason (I would guess as an "investment"), the owner of a Carpet company my mother was the bookkeepper for bought several large bags of the Ike coins, and kept them in a vault along with the cash receivables through the late 80's into the mid 90's. When I would visit my mother at work, or stay home from school sick, he would give me one of the coins. In fact, this may be my origin story of how I got into coins at a very early age, but I honestly don't remember exactly how, so I can't say for sure. They were big and cool looking to a kid who was around 7 years old. As an adult collector getting back into the hobby I decided they were ugly. Big modern ugly crap. Then at some point, after being in the hobby again for a few years, I suddenly changed my mind again. I am fairly certain it was due to my CAC Type set, and the sudden and unexpected decision of [URL='https://coinweek.com/education/coin-grading/cac-to-accept-eisenhower-dollars/']CAC accepting Ikes around 2012[/URL]. I bought a few, submitted them, and was going to keep one in my set. Well, low-and-behold, holding them in my hands again, they looked big and cool to me. I've thought long and hard about what it is that made me so dislike the coins, and in the end, I think its because they photograph poorly, the design just looks big and ugly and simplistic, and when I would view them online, I had a negative reaction. It probably was a bit of snobbery too. But in hand, these coins were attractive and brought back the fond memories. Well, with CAC accepting the coins, others started taking notice. And while I am sure they are still a pariah coin for a lot of people, if you look at the pricing for high grade clad examples, it's doubtful people would say they are still undervalued. I am posting this as an example of what can happen to undervalued and underappreciated series. They can suddenly become cool again due to things like Registry sets, CAC inclusion, and evolving collector sentiments. Maybe some of the other examples in this thread will likewise experience a boost out of the bargain bins. [ATTACH=full]1064824[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
What do YOU think is an undervalued series?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...