Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What do you call the bright horizontal mark?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8090777, member: 24314"]jeffB, posted: "I think it's all down to what you're rubbing <i>with</i>, and of course how hard."</p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">No, we don't always need to determine the who, what, where, and when to describe what we see on a coin. Additionally, we don't need to be ambiguous either. Indeed, a hit from the reeds of another coin is a <b>mark</b>. Educated numismatists have a name for that particular mark (reed mark or bag mark). Folks can use it or not. What they choose to do <b>defines them</b> to others.</span></i> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Mac McDonald, post: "BETTER ANSWER...IMO: This <b><u>mark</u></b> is best called a mark. [<i><span style="color: #660033">PLEASE SEE ABOVE for the difference between being informed or uninformed</span></i>] So many use the term or variation of "mark" as exampled in these posts...and then make the interpretive and subjective decision of adding and/or substituting something else, of which another disagrees with. Better as simply a "mark" or "marks"...even and especially on TPG labels...and allow others to decide what they think. [<b><span style="color: #660033">Which is often not correct!!</span></b>] Maybe heavy or light mark/marks...even abrasive marks or scratch marks...disqualifying mark(s), etc...but by at least including the term mark/marks, one isn't passing judgment for what it is/isn't over something else as it appears to another. No matter how hard you try you'll never define/standardize the terms of people's interpretations...and better to simply be leaving it up to the other person(s) to decide for themselves what THEY think the mark(s) is, rather than what many are going to disagree with ("it's a scratch...no, that's a gouge...no it's a scrape...no it's too narrow...it's not wide, thin, deep enough to be...no metal was moved...oh yes I think there was"...and on and on...with all respect for what you're trying to do). Whatever it is/isn't...it most certainly IS a <b>mark</b>...and you'll always be right."<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie101" alt=":woot:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">The point is <b>not</b> to be right, the point is to be able to describe a characteristic. With just a little practice and study it becomes easy. Our mind is like a computer. Feed in lousy info (It's a mark, they are all marks.) and the result is:</span></i> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie96" alt=":vomit:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8090777, member: 24314"]jeffB, posted: "I think it's all down to what you're rubbing [I]with[/I], and of course how hard." [I][COLOR=#660033]No, we don't always need to determine the who, what, where, and when to describe what we see on a coin. Additionally, we don't need to be ambiguous either. Indeed, a hit from the reeds of another coin is a [B]mark[/B]. Educated numismatists have a name for that particular mark (reed mark or bag mark). Folks can use it or not. What they choose to do [B]defines them[/B] to others.[/COLOR][/I] ;) Mac McDonald, post: "BETTER ANSWER...IMO: This [B][U]mark[/U][/B] is best called a mark. [[I][COLOR=#660033]PLEASE SEE ABOVE for the difference between being informed or uninformed[/COLOR][/I]] So many use the term or variation of "mark" as exampled in these posts...and then make the interpretive and subjective decision of adding and/or substituting something else, of which another disagrees with. Better as simply a "mark" or "marks"...even and especially on TPG labels...and allow others to decide what they think. [[B][COLOR=#660033]Which is often not correct!![/COLOR][/B]] Maybe heavy or light mark/marks...even abrasive marks or scratch marks...disqualifying mark(s), etc...but by at least including the term mark/marks, one isn't passing judgment for what it is/isn't over something else as it appears to another. No matter how hard you try you'll never define/standardize the terms of people's interpretations...and better to simply be leaving it up to the other person(s) to decide for themselves what THEY think the mark(s) is, rather than what many are going to disagree with ("it's a scratch...no, that's a gouge...no it's a scrape...no it's too narrow...it's not wide, thin, deep enough to be...no metal was moved...oh yes I think there was"...and on and on...with all respect for what you're trying to do). Whatever it is/isn't...it most certainly IS a [B]mark[/B]...and you'll always be right.":woot: [I][COLOR=#660033]The point is [B]not[/B] to be right, the point is to be able to describe a characteristic. With just a little practice and study it becomes easy. Our mind is like a computer. Feed in lousy info (It's a mark, they are all marks.) and the result is:[/COLOR][/I] :vomit:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
What do you call the bright horizontal mark?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...