Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1301981, member: 19065&quot;]Your a real gem! It&#039;s quite amusing to see you trying to reweave the intent of your original <i>thoughts</i> and tip toe out of this now that you got called on it by not only me but by the very person you criticized in the first place by commenting in this thread. Tossing the word &quot;opinion&quot; in there only technically covers your but from claims implying you to be libelous. There you are even mocking litigation in post #56. You do nothing but clown about these threads bleating your &#039;opinions&#039; in a myriad of threads, and it often draws the ire of others here for your casual lack of facts to back them up or for their attempt to derail the OP to some other experience you want to recount. </p><p><br /></p><p>You can also stop trying to bait the argument by twisting my own defense of this subject. You simply failed to communicate through your &#039;opinions&#039; in your original post on the subject and now want to cover your butt on the topic, in do doing, attempting to seed further misconceptions to debase my own complaints of what you and others have tried to do here. This is not an attempt to flame you nor advertise someone else&#039;s work as you so trivially continue to talk about this, it&#039;s about demoting any lazy opinions and inaccuracies that serve to confuse others on the subject, which your comments effectively served to do. Take more responsibility for your opinions where facts are called for and you might earn more respect that take fire in threads, do that more often, and you&#039;ll be &quot;cool&quot;.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in